GM Out Of Control In China, India

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

China and the world are waiting for a press conference to be held at 5pm local time (0900 zulu,) for which GM is promising “some important GM news,” relating to SAIC, says Reuters. Nick Reilly will take time off from restructuring Opel, and will personally host the conference.

It is widely expected that GM will cede control of the 50:50 China joint venture by selling 1 percent to SAIC. They will also most likely announce that GM will transfer half of GM’s India operations to the Chinese company.

According to Gasgoo’s sources, SAIC will have “a controlling stake in GM’s flagship venture in its fastest-growing market. However, GM would retain equal voting rights in company decisions. SAIC could pay up to 20 percent of the joint venture value to take control, while GM would have the option of buying back the stake later at a premium.”

GM is now mortgaging its second-most important market, China. By the looks of it, China will soon buy more GM vehicles than the USA.

India is (rightly or wrongly) seen as the “next China” as far as growth markets go, and auto manufacturers are falling over themselves carving out a share of the pie. GM doesn’t have much of a share. India is owned by Suzuki. In August of this year, GM had abandoned plans to get 10 percent market share in India by 2010, because “the economic downturn has forced us to go for a change of plans. We are now re-scheduling the target till 2011.” In 2008, the Indian automobile industry ranked as the ninth largest in the world with an annual production of over 2.3 million units. With more than 1.15b people, India is the second most populous nation on the planet, behind China. By handing a large chunk of its (future) Indian business to China’s SAIC, GM is admitting defeat, or is minimizing its potential in one of the world’s few growth markets, or is admitting that they don’t have the money to develop that market, or all of the above.

What’s more, SAIC is flexing its muscles. It’s telling its weakened partner who’s really boss on this side of the globe.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Bunter1 Bunter1 on Dec 04, 2009

    And if (when?) things continue to slide in Yurp and NA does the strong partner continue to gobble up little (big?) pieces of the former empire? One wonders how the "patiotic" fans of GM might react if the corporation was Chinese controlled. Bunter

  • Rnc Rnc on Dec 04, 2009

    My question is - The JV's are not allowed to export from China (domestic only), does SAIC owning 51% change the way the entity is recognized and allow for exports? And yes SAIC is paying quite a lot for thier 1%, the money is for Opel and Daewoo (would you rather finance yourself or have multiple government hands holding the wheel along with you, think they have already learned that lesson from the German government)

    • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Dec 04, 2009

      rnc: Where did you read that JV's are only allowed to export if the Chinese hold more than 51%? AFAIK, this has nothing to do with it. The "no export" clause (without the other side agreeing to it) is usually part of the contract between the two JV partners. It protects the foreign JV partner from a flood of their own cars made abroad. The Chinese government would be overjoyed if there would be more exports, even if the JV partner would hold only 1%. I know from my buddies at VW that there are small scale trial exports (to Australia, Northern Africa) happening, and they sure don't have a problem with that alleged clause.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next