OICA President Walks Back Criticism Of US Auto Industry
A week ago the president of OICA, Patrick Blain, ruffled some feathers on this side of the Atlantic by laying into the US auto industry with such bon mots as
If the American manufacturers had gone years ago to the government and said, ‘Listen, we have a huge project’ – electric cars, for instance, the government could at least have studied it. But they never tried.
Take the Chevrolet Volt (extended-range electric vehicle launched in 2010). Without government help, at least in the developmental stages in which certain economies of scale must be reached, it is too expensive. It’s just another example of the American industry being too late. They have missed many trends.
Because the sign of an innovative automaker is entanglement with the government… just ask Blain’s compatriots (and former colleagues) at Renault! Oh, and incidentally, Detroit did approach the government for help developing green cars back in the 1990s and managed to waste a cool billion dollars building three prototypes (see: PNGV). But there I go taking Blain at his word… when he’s already walking back his nonsensical comments.
Wards Auto was kind enough to give Monsieur Blain the opportunity to mitigate his unnecessarily inflammatory comments. Unsurprisingly, however, Blain’s walk-back is just as incomprehensible as his initial comments:
In a new auto world, with so many different power technologies (electric, hybrid, classical) things are getting more and more complex, and we must understand each auto world.
Every government, every nation has its own automotive culture. What I wanted to highlight is that manufacturers, with different technologies, gas prices, taxes, government incentives are all reducing, in a drastic way, (carbon-dioxide) emissions. That is definitely not what I explained. Some started sooner, some later, but they drive all in the same direction.
Apparently Blain’s volte-face came after the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which represents American-based automakers, entered “discussions” with Blain. Apparently it wasn’t hard to convince Blain that he was talking nonsense, but it seems to have been much more difficult to get him to actually start making sense. Meanwhile, Americans are now free to continue ignoring OICA as they have for decades.
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Guy 90's name, does Cavalier count it was around before,during and after the 90's. A Corsica SUV with a Beretta SUV "coupe" counterpart? On the aside if they keep the Durango name they have to keep it in Detroit per the UAW. Change the name and its not a next gen Durango anymore.
- DM335 Ford could produce a "coupe" version of the Explorer called the Thunderbird. To do it properly, it would take new sheet metal and would need to combine some historical Thunderbird styling cues (large taillamps, metal bird emblems, etc.--no landau bars please). Of course, the market for these sporty SUVS such as the BMW X6 and MB GLE coupe is not large, so this would likely not be a financially-feasible plan.
- Kevin I traded in my 2022 Civic Si after a year and this is one factor. It is Sep. 24 and still no recall, just a TSB so Honda can sweep it under the rug.This plus a terrible engine/tuning, bad safety tech, missing features, and the most rattling interior I've ever heard ensured I won't be buying another Honda ever again and I've loved Honda since the 2000's. They are not the same brand, or they are the same but cars are more complicated so the cracks really show now. Either way people were also having steering issues with the 10th gen civics also and Honda ignored them. Don't buy a Honda please. Everything about my Si besides the handling felt like a beta car, not a complete product.
- 1995 SC Blazer
- Jalop1991 you know, I can't help but remember the Dilbert cartoon where Dilbert commented to the janitor about how Dilbert has two cans under his desk, one for trash and one for recycling, but he's noticed that the janitor who comes around at night has only one large can. This is all smoke and mirrors. Mark my words, we will see stories down the road about place like this taking the recycling fees and dumping the batteries in a pit in some third world country.
Comments
Join the conversation
Don't forget, OICA was founded in Paris as a mostly European organization and it's still based in Paris. He speaks like a French diplomat, talking in circles. French diplomats somehow have amazing success arriving at incomprehensible agreements that everyone signs off on, so Blain can be forgiven for wanting to emulate them. Re: his "years ago..." comment, he's obviously unaware of the American style of governance. He should look closely at the national clean air effort in the 1970s, when automakers weren't allowed to "collude" with each other for that common goal. The result was a different smog system for every manufacturer, and a headache for car owners and mechanics alike. That's not how standards are developed in Europe.
What missed trends? With Volt (and EV-1 before that) America is at least as good as any other auto-producing continents as far as electric vehicle is concerned. Sure the Japanese were more successful in their Prius as far as sales are concerned, but technology wise? There are no countries in which the EV has become commonplace, with infrastructures in place, so they're still in its infancy, just like they're in the U.S. Certainly not France. Anyway, I think these whole movements into electric vehicle is a tad premature. Most electricity is still generated through traditional, polluting method, using non-renewable fuel. If electricity use skyrocket due to popularity of EVs, how's that going to help the environment or conserve non-renewable energy sources? Not to mention the electricity grid might not be able to cope with the increased usage. If we had found a way to cheaply generate electricity through non-polluting means, fusion power, solar, etc. then it would make sense to start converting our transportation tool to electric.