By on November 21, 2011

Private citizens can arrest other motorists suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), the Louisiana Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday. A three-judge panel considered the case of Tracy L. Common who was stopped in Westwego by Gretna Police Detective Brian Rico at 9pm on December 31, 2006. Rico was off-duty and outside his jurisdiction.

That night, Rico saw Common’s Chevy S-10 pickup truck swerving on the road and felt the driver was seriously impaired. He activated the lights on his unmarked car and conducted a stop without waiting for the local police to arrive. When Common hopped out of the car, Rico conducted a pat-down search which turned up 50 pills and $1100 in cash. A later search of his car by local police uncovered $2000 and some marijuana.

Though Rico was a police officer, the court assumed he was acting as an ordinary citizen, citing the 2008 appellate case Louisiana v. Lavergne which upheld a DUI traffic stop performed by a volunteer firefighter from Texas.

“Our brethren on the First Circuit held that the defendant’s erratic driving was sufficient to justify a stop for the felony offense of aggravated obstruction of a highway of commerce, which authorized a private citizen to make the arrest,” Judge Susan M. Chehardy wrote for the Fifth Circuit panel. “In this case, as in Lavergne, Detective Rico observed the defendant driving erratically when his vehicle swerved across three lanes of traffic on the Westbank Expressway and nearly collided with Detective Rico’s vehicle…. Here, as in Lavergne, we see no error in the finding that a private citizen who witnessed aggravated obstruction of a highway is authorized to arrest a defendant.”

State law allows private citizens to make arrests for felony offenses, and driving in a way that endangers human life qualifies under the highway obstruction statute. As a result of Rico’s search, Common was found to be in possession of MDMA or ecstasy, for which he was sentenced to seven years of hard labor. The sentence was later upgraded to ten years after the lower court learned it was Common’s fourth felony conviction. Common argued the evidence should be thrown out because it violated his constitutional rights. The court disagreed.

“Evidence seized pursuant to a search by a private citizen, acting in his capacity as a private citizen, is not excluded under the Fourth Amendment because the amendment only protects individuals against governmental intrusion,” Chehardy wrote. “Thus, the pills confiscated by the private citizen would not be excluded under the Fourth Amendment.”

The judges found procedural errors with the penalty imposed, so they ordered him resentenced. A copy of the decision is available in a 500k PDF file at the source link below.

Source: PDF File Louisiana v. Common (Court of Appeals, State of Louisiana, 11/15/2011)


Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


5 Comments on “Louisiana Court Affirms Citizen Right to Make DUI Arrests...”

  • avatar

    The arrest was fine ie preventing harm to other road users and any one would be justified in doing so. it was the search that was wrong as the off duty officer was acting in the way of a police officer.

    • 0 avatar

      What I want to know is, did he disclose that he was acting as a private citizen? The lights on an unmarked car could otherwise be considered emblematic of a “governmental intrusion”.

  • avatar

    Watch out folks: in Massachusetts a DUI is not necessarily a felony (depends on the number of offenses). Therefore, a citizen’s arrest could be illegal since it does not pertain to a felony in progress that you are witnessing. You could be liable for damages.

    FWIW I am a layman, if my reading of the law is incorrect, let me know.

  • avatar

    More judicial insanity. Obviously, being severely drunk and/or drugged behind the wheel, swerving across 3 lanes of traffic, endangering others, etc, are all indefensible.

    But how exactly is an average citizen supposed to arrest a drunk driver? Chase them down? Force them off the road? Can you imagine the potential carnage that could result?

    If chased by a civilian car, the drunk could/would most likely freak out, may think it’s an attempted carjacking or some other form of violence or attack, and could become an even greater danger to themselves or others.

    I thought procedure was to call 911 with a vehicle description and location if you spot an obvious drunk/dangerous or erratic driver. Common sense says to leave the DUI arrests to the professionals.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • 55_wrench: When I restored my ’65 Monza convertible in 1976 I snagged a pair of front seats from a wrecked...
  • eggsalad: I cherish the assumption you all seem to have that things will return to what they once were. I do not...
  • SCE to AUX: “the cash-flush, high-credit-score 56-plus-year-old.” That’s me exactly. And I have...
  • 2drsedanman: Don’t need or want a truck, but that RAM 2500 in the pic above is a great looking vehicle! That...
  • SuperCarEnthusiast: I think the upscale luxury SUV market will be the first to bounce back!

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Timothy Cain
  • Matthew Guy
  • Ronnie Schreiber
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth