California Governor Sides With Red Light Camera Companies
California Governor Jerry Brown (D) sided on Friday with red light camera companies and the remaining municipalities that use automated ticketing machines. He vetoed a measure that would have placed the mildest of restrictions on photo ticketing.
“I am returning Senate Bill 29 without my signature,” Brown wrote in his veto message. “This bill standardizes rules for local governments to follow when installing and maintaining red light cameras. This is something that can and should be overseen by local elected officials.”
State law already authorizes local officials to use red light cameras and does so by setting a number of standards. The vetoed measure would have added a handful of new restrictions that, for the most part, reflect the current practice of photo ticketing programs in the Golden State. The bill’s most significant provision would have banned the use of “snitch tickets,” which are notices that look like tickets that red light camera vendors mail to registered vehicle owners to trick them into disclosing the identity of the driver in a red light camera photograph. California law requires that only the actual person behind the wheel receive the ticket. The legislation would require a clear and prominent statement on such vendor mailings that there is no penalty for failure to respond. The bill’s sponsor, State Senator Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), was disappointed by Brown’s move.
“I think we can keep folks safe and still give the driving public a fair shake,” Simitian said in a statement. “I’m sorry the governor didn’t agree.”
The California Department of Finance, which serves as the chief fiscal policy advisor to the governor’s office, offered the only written opposition to the bill.
“Department of Finance is opposed to this bill because it would make the installation and operation of red light cameras more cumbersome for local agencies, which is likely to result in their reduced or discontinued use,” the Senate legislative summary explained. “This could reduce annual revenues to the state and to local jurisdictions by approximately $140 million annually.”
The state Senate will now decide whether to override Brown’s veto. The bill passed the body by a 38-0 vote on September 1, a more than sufficient amount. It sailed through the state Assembly by a similarly large 70-4 vote on August 30.
[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]
More by The Newspaper
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Varezhka Maybe the volume was not big enough to really matter anyways, but losing a “passenger car” for a mostly “light truck” line-up should help Subaru with their CAFE numbers too.
- Varezhka For this category my car of choice would be the CX-50. But between the two cars listed I’d select the RAV4 over CR-V. I’ve always preferred NA over small turbos and for hybrids THS’ longer history shows in its refinement.
- AZFelix I would suggest a variation on the 'fcuk, marry, kill' game using 'track, buy, lease' with three similar automotive selections.
- Formula m For the gas versions I like the Honda CRV. Haven’t driven the hybrids yet.
- SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
Comments
Join the conversation
Do not give these monkeys your hard earned cash! They need a clear picture of you to proceed so have something ready like a ball hat to cover your face. Straw or mesh hats are easier to see out of so give them an unusable picture because in states like California it's a criminal citation and they absolutely have to prove you're the driver. Or just simply flip the visor down and hold your head up till you can't see the camera.
I have to admit, watching socialists suffer the consequences of their political stupidity is one of life's greatest pleasures.