Houston Residents Unload on City Council Over Red Light Decision

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper
houston residents unload on city council over red light decision

Hundreds of Houston, Texas residents swarmed the city council chambers yesterday to complain about the reactivation of red light cameras. Voters in November enacted a charter amendment banning the use of automated ticketing machines, but a federal judge worked with the city attorney and vendor American Traffic Solutions (ATS) to nullify the election so that the cameras could come back.

“Ever since I was a little kid I was told this was the greatest nation in the world and it was great because I had a vote and my vote counted,” resident Terry Dry said. “It appears my vote does not. I’m asking y’all as our elected leaders, we voted. Turn them off. And if you’re not going to do that, I would like to know where each council member stands on the issue so that we can get some people in here who will do the people’s will in the next election.”

The audience broke out into boisterous applause until Mayor Annise Parker interrupted.

“We do not allow displays like that in this chamber, and the police will clear the chamber if we cannot have order,” Parker said. “We have a process and we’re going to hear from every one of you…. I personally believe they say lives. I get the whole thing about the vote.”

Parker insisted the city legal team was fighting as hard as it can to uphold the will of the voters, but given the city’s budget deficit, she had no choice but to reactivate the system. ATS had threatened to sue for $20 million if the cameras were not reactivated, but some residents questioned Parker’s claims.

“I’d love to see a jury that would give that verdict,” local attorney Eric Dick said. “Why are we looking to expand the cameras if our intention is to turn them off? The case is on appeal. Are we going to refund the money if the city loses the appeal for the cameras? I think it’s just crazy what we’re doing.”

Councilman Jolanda Jones agreed with many of the speakers and pointed out that Parker acted on her own in reactivating the cameras. The mayor refused Jones’ request to allow the council to vote on whether to respect the November election results.

“This is no longer a legal issue,” initiative co-sponsor Paul Kubosh said. “You can hide behind whatever federal judge you want. It does not matter. This is now a political issue. This body is in danger of losing this issue. Let me make sure that you folks understand. This will never go away, and we’re not going to wait until 2014.”

The Kubosh brothers said they intended to file another charter amendment that would remove the thirty-day time limit for the filing of a referendum. They may also weaken the position of mayor by allowing two councilmen to place items on the city council agenda.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Dynamic88 Dynamic88 on Aug 03, 2011

    My guess is that most of the current city council members will be re-elected.

  • Jcwconsult Jcwconsult on Aug 04, 2011

    There are temporary engineering changes the city could make to drastically reduce the citations and revenue from the cameras, likely low enough that ATS would ask to end the contract early because they would be taking financial losses from the contract with very few citations issued. This would accomplish the will of the people in another way, a way that would not risk millions of dollars in a lawsuit with ATS. So far, the city flatly refuses to take these simple temporary measures to honor the will of the people. It is likely that the revenue is still more important to the Mayor and some Council members than honoring the will of the people. This pursuit of the revenue at all costs might not change until the "noise" level from angry citizens gets high enough that city hall cannot ignore it. Ultimately, the citizens may have to remove every official who ever supported the cameras from office, both the elected ones and the appointed ones. James C. Walker, National Motorists Association, www.motorists.org, Ann Arbor, MI (frequent visitor to Texas for extended stays)

  • Arthur Dailey Ford was on a roll with these large cars. The 'aircraft' inspired instrument 'pod' for the driver rather than the 'flat' instrument panel. Note that this vehicle does not have the clock. The hands and numbers are missing. Having the radio controls on the left side of the driver could however be infuriating. Although I admire pop-up/hideaway headlights, Ford's vacuum powered system was indeed an issue. If I left my '78 T-Bird parked for more than about 12 hours, there was a good chance that when I returned the headlight covers had retracted. The first few times this happened it gave me a 'start' as I feared that I may have left the lights on and drained the battery.
  • Jeff S Still a nice car and I remember these very well especially in this shade of green. The headlights were vacuum controlled. I always liked the 67 thru 72 LTDs after that I found them bloated. Had a friend in college with a 2 door 71 LTD which I drove a couple of times it was a nice car.
  • John H Last week after 83 days, dealership said mine needs new engine now. They found metal in oil. Potential 8 to 9 month wait.
  • Dukeisduke An aunt and uncle of mine traded their '70 T-Bird (Beakbird) for a brand-new dark metallic green '75 LTD two-door, fully loaded. My uncle hated seat belts, so the first time I saw the car (it was so new that the '75 models had just landed at the dealerships) he proudly showed me how he'd pulled the front seat belts all the way out of their retractors, and cut the webbing with a razor blade(!).Just a year later, they traded it in for a new '76 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (they had owned a couple of Imperials in the '60s), and I imagine the Cadillac dealer took a chunk out to the trade-in, to get the front seat belts replaced.
  • CaddyDaddy Lease fodder that in 6 years will be on the 3rd owner in a poverty bound aspirational individual's backyard in a sub par neighborhood sinking into the dirt. The lending bank will not even want to repossess and take possession of this boat anchor of a toxic waste dump. This proves that EVs are not even close to being ready for prime time (let's not even talk about electrical infrastructure). EVs only exist in wildly expensive virtue signaling status-mobiles. FAIL! I know this is a Hybrid, but it's a Merc., so it will quickly die after the warranty. Show me a practical EV for the masses and I'll listen. At this time, Hybrids are about the way to go for most needing basic transportation.
Next