GM: Impala Suspension Problems Are "Old GM's" Liability

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The Detroit News’s David Shepardson reports that GM has requested the dismissal of a lawsuit alleging rear-suspension problems on 2007-8 model-year Impalas, on the grounds that

“New GM did not assume liability for old GM’s design choices, conduct or alleged breaches of liability under the warranty, and its terms expressly preclude money damages,” the response says.

The suit “is trying to saddle new GM with the alleged liability and conduct of old GM.”

The suit alleges that GM issued a service bulletin for police-fleet 2007-8 Impalas, which were eating through rear tires due to faulty spindle rods. In that bulletin, GM instructed its dealers to replace the rods as well as rear tires, where appropriate. But GM argues that police versions are different than civilian models, and has not issued a bulletin for regular-duty Impalas… and now, on top of it all, its arguing that the “new” post-bailout GM “only agreed to warranty obligations of cars assembled before 2009.” As many as 400,000 Impalas could be affected by the spindle rod issue (which GM says is a manufacturing problem, not a design defect), which could cause rear tires to wear out in as few as 6,000 miles. And despite the clear evidence that GM knew about the problem and fixed police-fleet versions, the bailout liability dump defense could just work: at least one lawsuit (regarding OnStar failure) has already been dismissed on the grounds that New GM is not liable for Old GM’s mistakes. The bailout, it seems, is the shafting that just keeps on shafting…

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 68 comments
  • Mikey Mikey on Aug 19, 2011

    @ doctor olds...According to my local dealer. GM will honor all warranty claims concerning premature tire wear.

  • DaddyOfPayton DaddyOfPayton on Aug 19, 2011

    If I follow the logic here about bankruptcy wiping out obligations, then the correct path for car companies in the new millenium is to declare bankruptcy every 5 or 6 years, take a massive infusion of tax dollars, and "re-emerge" as the same company minus the pesky warranties. Does this work for UAW pension obligations too?

    • Doctor olds Doctor olds on Aug 19, 2011

      @mikey- thanks for comment. I expect, and hope that is the case everywhere. @DaddyOfPayton- New GM is honoring ALL warranties AND continuing to fund the UAW pension obligations. No doubt, the management did not choose and would rather NOT have been forced into bankruptcy. They had no other options, nor did they get to choose the conditions imposed by the Obama administration's Auto Task Force.

  • Iantm Iantm on Aug 20, 2011

    Wife had an 04 Chevy Malibu that turned into an absolute lemon. When we caught a whiff of the impending bankruptcy in the spring of 09, we dumped it and replaced it with the 06 VW New Beetle Convertible she wanted so bad. Oddly enough, the VW has proven rock solid compared to the Malibu.

  • CJinSD CJinSD on Aug 20, 2011

    This will keep happening to car buyers for as long as there are car buyers willing to buy GM products. And when there aren't enough of them, the process will be prolonged by corrupt politicians.

    • ZoomZoom ZoomZoom on Aug 20, 2011

      Absolutely true. Government Motors should never have been bailed out. It was morally wrong to take my tax money without my permission and do this. A traditional bankruptcy would have been the moral and correct thing to do.

Next