By on July 29, 2011

AlixPartners, the consulting firm that led GM’s reorganization efforts, has put the perennial optimism of auto industry analysts on notice, introducing its 2011 Automotive Outlook by arguing

The AlixPartners 2011 Automotive Outlook finds that while automakers and suppliers have seen profits bounce back handsomely – North American original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) posted $12.5 billion in 2010 profit on a net margin of 4.6% and North American suppliers reaped $8.2 billion on a net margin of 4.3% – no one should be tempted into thinking that things are now back to “normal,” or at least the normal defined by the consumer-incentive-induced sales levels of the past. In sync with its past annual auto studies, AlixPartners continues to predict that U.S. auto sales will climb slower, and to a lower peak, than many others are predicting. Specifically, the firm estimates U.S. auto sales will reach just 12.7 million units this year and only 13.6 million in 2012.

This is a tough moment for us: on the one hand, pessimistic economic forecasts don’t make anybody happy… on the other hand, the AlixPartner outlook is a significant validation of TTAC’s longtime bearishness. So rather than either moping or self-congratulating, let’s just take a look at why AlixPartners is so gloomy about the near-term outlook.

First, a little more on the market outlook, which predicts

13% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for small cars and a 7% CAGR for small crossover vehicles between now and 2015 in the U.S., as large cars, SUVs and pickups are expected to see a CAGR of just 2%, respectively, in that time. The study also finds that pickup-truck sales will be hurt by the continuing housing crisis. U.S. pickup sales for 2011 are estimated to reach only 1.7 million units, well below the recent peak of 2.9 million in 2006.

But it turns out that weak demand in the US, driven by under- and unemployment, a weak housing market and a slow recovery, is only part of the industry’s challenge. John Hoffecker, managing director at AlixPartners sets the stage:

It’s a cliché, but the auto industry really does face a ‘brave new world,’ and the differentiators for winning in the world we are transitioning to will be significantly different from the past.The good news is that most of the U.S. players now have their costs in line to capitalize on a slow, steady sales recovery. On the other hand, the industry is facing some truly momentous, and momentously expensive, decisions on everything from powertrain choices to emerging markets; and for OEMs to count on a U.S. sales bubble like in the last cycle – artificially-induced to begin with – to help fund all that is wishful thinking at best.

Technologically, the auto industry could well be on the cusp of its biggest set of changes since the invention of the internal-combustion engine more than 100 years ago. This will put unprecedented pressure on all players to pick the right business models, the right legal and capital structures, and the right partners. And, this all comes at a time of potential margin erosion as the industry, in general, shifts to smaller vehicles, both for regulatory and consumer-preference reasons. Preventing that erosion will be key.

What makes a convergence of technological and sales challenges so potentially dangerous, is what AlixPartners calls “competitive convergence”:

One of the striking features of the new automotive industry is the convergence among competitors around the globe in areas including cost, quality, production processes, supply chain, management expertise and, last but not least, profitability. Profitability parity is evidenced by the fact that last year earnings-before-income-taxes (EBIT) margins for automakers globally clustered in a tight band ranging from 4.3% to 5.7% — with OEMs in China and India at 5.2%, while suppliers from China and India enjoyed an EBIT margin of 7.5%, the highest in the world.

This competitive convergence, the study says, will require big leaps forward in differentiators such as consumer-focused innovation, product-development excellence, truly strategic partnerships at various places around the globe, careful brand-building and, perhaps above all else, a general focus on speed – in achieving either first-mover advantage or fast-follower leverage.

With the bulk of sales growth shifting to emerging markets, commodity costs rising and overcapacity lingering, the US market is hardly the engine that drove the global auto business that it once was. It’s still hugely important, as the second largest national market in the world, but the case for bearish behavior in the US market is strong. The real question in my mind after reviewing this report is: how will the automakers respond? Will our debt-weakened demand be met with a malaise of underinvestment? Given the technological arms race, one would hope not, but rising costs (from technology and raw materials) and sluggish demand do not make for a great combination. Consumers have nearly as much reason for concern here as the automakers themselves…

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

7 Comments on ““Brave New World”: AlixPartners Predicts Auto Market Headwinds, “Competitive Convergence,” And Other Challenges...”

  • avatar

    A small correction, EBIT is earnings before interest and taxes.

  • avatar

    I think the prominence of the automobile in North American society went far beyond what was justified by the technology. Coercive and pervasive marketing disguised this reality for a long time, but the blinders are off. I don’t think we will ever again have the interest or the capital to pour into something that is so costly relative to the rewards. The emerging automobile markets will not be fooled by the conditioning as long as our culture was, since they can see what we’ve gone through.

    Automakers will become increasingly unidentifiable by “nationality”.

    For those prone to misinterpretation, this does not mean I think cars/trucks will disappear.

    • 0 avatar

      I think you are right; it’s been over a generation since last big auto enthusiast generation. I noticed the ‘tuner’ crowd is in heavy decline too. The latest generation seems more interested in drifting in video games, than in real life. I think some of this has to do with snobbery by oldsters, and the economics of having a vehicle just for fun, on roads that are clogged with unfun traffic. Why go out, when you can hang out with your friends on your headset? If you do have to go out, a front drive, slush box, sans right-to-tow appliance will do (or a transit pass). I guess this is the new reality.

      • 0 avatar

        Interesting. I don’t think obsession with cars is any more “real life” than video games. Whatever gets the heart pounding. Certainly on-line activities are more readily available than cars, and there’s a good chance we would have turned to them rather than cars, had they been available in our formative years.

        Certainly being online consumes less resources than car culture. And connectivity has more potential to generate wealth than cars. While cars allow some socializing via travel, they also unavoidably separate people from each other.

        Perhaps some day the connected generation will look back and see the alienation of their online past, as another generation eschews it for physically proximal community.

    • 0 avatar

      I think the prominence of the automobile in North American society went far beyond what was justified by the technology. Coercive and pervasive marketing disguised this reality for a long time, but the blinders are off.

      I doubt we’ll see sales of 17m cars and 9m trucks per year for 5 years at least. Depending on gas prices, trucks may never get there again…

      It grinds my (geek) gears that the graph, with the x-axis at 4 million, exaggerates the decline. Although, with more profitable truck sales down 1/3, the hit to manufacturer’s profits (especially GM and Ford) is underestimated.

      • 0 avatar

        I’m with you, I despise graphs that don’t go to zero at the bottom. As often than not, it shows intent to mislead.

        It’s not quite as bad if there’s a visual break in the vertical axis to warn the reader, but still not great.

        Explained for high/middle school students at the bottom of page 2:

  • avatar

    Even as nuanced as that analysis is, I’d still say that it completely ignores some basic facts:

    In 2006 27% of all new car purchases were financed via home equity loans. (That’s from the Economist) If you think that freebie for the industry is coming back (ie, easy/stupid finance) anytime soon, guess what? I have some beachfront property in Arizona I’d like to sell you.

    The easy money of the last decade not only created a housing bubble, it also created an auto bubble, and thus talking about a ‘normal’ year or ‘bounce back’ is incredibly dubious.

    Cars simply last longer than in previous decades… duh. The average age of a car on the roads today is 10 years old, and these are not rust-buckets, buring a quart of oil every 200 miles. There is less demand because the product is less self-obsolescing. Although we are nearly back to late 1960’s demnad levels, there are roughly twice as many drivers on the road. You can extrapolate that to suggests cars last roughly twice as long… I’d agree with that.

    Additionaly, yeah, if that is a direct quote from the research and the author doesn’t even understand EBIT — not much credibility for the rest of it.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Oberkanone: EVs now account for 4.6% of all passenger vehicles being sold in the U.S. 4.6% is an important number....
  • Lou_BC: @Jeff S – congratulations. I’ve had a nightmare experience finding a diesel ZR2. GM had shifted...
  • EBFlex: “ Have you taken care of the three decals out for the Escape pickup yet?” My mistake. Autocorrect is...
  • buzzyrpm: City and street design in the US makes the majority of roads extremely dangerous. Particularly when there...
  • Lou_BC: I’ve read that it costs 5 – 15 billion over 5 – 7 years to build a new refinery. None of...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber