The Most And Least Died-In Vehicles Of 2006-2009

the most and least died in vehicles of 2006 2009

Forget crash test results, star ratings, or the number of acronym-laden electronic nanny systems that a vehicle has. If you’re a play-it-by-the-numbers kind of person and want to know safe a car is, statistically speaking, you’ll want to check out the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s new status report on “Dying In A Crash” [ PDF]. The latest data comes from the 2006-2009 period, and includes only 2005-2008 model-year vehicles with at least 100,000 “registered vehicle years” in that time frame (if a vehicle was substantially redesigned in 2005-08, only the most recent design is included). Also,

researchers adjusted for a variety of factors that affect crash rates, including driver age and gender, calendar year, vehicle age, and vehicle density at the garaging location. Previously, researchers had adjusted only for driver age and gender.

“The adjusted driver death rates do abetter job of teasing out differences among vehicles, but they can only go so far. For one thing, people don’t behave the same when they’re behind the wheel of a sports car as when they’re driving a minivan. And some people are more susceptible to injury and death for reasons that can’t completely be adjusted for.”

Keep in mind that this data is for drivers only, since passenger data is harder to adjust for. Also, statistics don’t determine your safety on an individual level… that’s up to you every time you take the wheel. For more caveats (and the complete list), check out the report itself… or just wave this in front of your friends and family members who drive cars on the “highest rates of driver death” list, and hyperventilate at them. They’ll either thank you or tell you to take your nannyish concern elsewhere.



Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 63 comments
  • Smallcars Smallcars on Jun 10, 2011

    A small car must be very well designed to prevent deaths. An SUV just has to stay on the road. Steel protects by absorbing collision energy and preventing intrusion into the passenger compartment. Since cars are being force to get better mpg, they are going to get smaller. There will be more fatalities. Carbon fiber does not absorb collision energy. I have invented a way to use polyurethane foam to make a small car seem bigger in a collision. www.safersmallcars.com

  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Jun 10, 2011

    Having just skimmed the comments, I read many of them yesterday but don't remember where I left off, I'm not sure if this idea has been explicitly stated or alluded to and apologize for a duplication of the above is the case. "Forget crash test results, star ratings, or the number of acronym-laden electronic nanny systems that a vehicle has." Personally, I think this chart might be interesting if there was a way to combine the overall safety ratings and safety systems included on the cars (say the features typically found in the cars bought with a given nameplate - maybe not all the features of the top end trim, but the trim most people buy) with the number of deaths. The reason this might be interesting is because I wonder if people become complacent when driving because they have the extra safety features which might lead to a greater amount of accidents, or if the two are not related in any way. I'm sure there are inherently unsafe cars on the road, but with the prevelance of safety features (TSC, ESC, ABS and the others that I'm not familiar enough with to place here) I'm sure there are people who say, "I've got XYZ and I don't need to be as careful." I apologize if this post is in any way unclear, but I'm sure you guys can see where I'm going with this.

  • 285exp I am quite sure that it is a complete coincidence that they have announced a $7k price increase the same week that the current administration has passed legislation extending the $7k tax credit that was set to expire. Yep, not at all related.
  • Syke Is it possible to switch the pure EV drive on and off? Given the wonderful throttle response of an EV, I could see the desirability of this for a serious off-roader. Run straight ICE to get to your off-roading site, switch over the EV drive during the off-road section, then back to ICE for the road trip back home.
  • ToolGuy Historical Perspective Moment:• First-gen Bronco debuted in MY1966• OJ Simpson Bronco chase was in 1994• 1966 to 1994 = 28 years• 1994 to now = 28 yearsFeel old yet?
  • Ronnie Schreiber From where is all that electricity needed to power an EV transportation system going to come? Ironically, the only EV evangelist that I know of who even mentions the fragile nature of our electrical grid is Elon Musk. None of the politicians pushing EVs go anywhere near it, well, unless they are advocating for unreliable renewables like wind and solar.
  • FreedMike I just don’t see the market here - I think about 1.2% of Jeep drivers are going to be sold on the fuel cost savings here. And the fuel cost savings are pretty minimal, per the EPA: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/PowerSearch.do?action=noform&path=1&year1=2022&year2=2022&make=Jeep&baseModel=Wrangler&srchtyp=ymm&pageno=1&rowLimit=50Annual fuel costs for this vehicle are $2200 and $2750 for the equivalent base turbo-four model. I don’t get it.
Next