Tata Troubled By Lack Of Progress In Fiat Alliance

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Before Fiat snapped up Chrysler from the US taxpayers for a song, it saw the Indian firm Tata as another logical partner for a long-term alliance. After Tata bought Jaguar/Land Rover, the auto media was awash in rumors that the British brand would share components with Fiat’s Alfa-Romeo brand. When Tata came out with the Nano, there was speculation that Fiat’s dealers in Europe and Latin America could be used to sell the low-cost car, even rumors of a Fiat-branded version were floated. Fiat even tried to sell Tata on one of its notoriously nasty Italian plants. What did surface from Fiat and Tata’s flirtations: a joint venture in India that, by all accounts, is going not well at all. And now, with Fiat distracted by its Chrysler rebuilding project, Ratan Tata is expressing his displeasure with his firm’s Fiat tie-up, telling The Hindu Businessline

I have to admit that so far, the venture with Fiat has not been as active as we had thought… I think that Fiat has to launch more models into the market to keep dealers interested. It also has to look at its cost structure in terms of parts and components. So the joint venture needs to be looked at quite critically and until that happens, it’s not going to be optimised… As far as what else we can do with Fiat, I think Sergio Marchionne and I can really talk to each other. However, at the working level, it hasn’t quite been that way. We have looked at Latin America to do something together, but things haven’t moved as they should have done

To which we say: good luck getting Fiat to sell your low-cost cars in Latin America. The Italian firm was supposed to sell multiple Chryslers in 90% of its Latin American dealers in order to acquire five percent of Chrysler’s equity, but it managed to get Treasury to reduce that requirement to “at least one” Chrysler vehicle (specifically, the Fiat “ Freemont” rebadge of the Dodge Journey) and only 90% of its Brazilian dealers. You’d think Fiat would want to sell vehicles abroad made by a firm it now owns, but apparently it is jealously guarding its Latin American markets from even Chrysler. If Tata thinks he’ll be able to get a better deal out of the notriously tough-negotiating Sergio Marchionne, he’s kidding himself. Meanwhile, with Fiat expanding in Russia and China, India seems unlikely to get many resources from the stretched-thin Italian firm… time for Marchionne to either work his trademark charm, or get ready to add an “I” to the ongoing rethink of the “R” and “C” of his BRIC strategy.

[HT:@dseetharaman, who updates via Twitter “Sergio Marchionne, donning his Fiat hat, says he hopes to meet the head of Tata before summer-end to discuss Fiat-Tata JV.”]


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Tstag Tstag on Jun 15, 2011

    Why is TATA bothering? It has the engineering capability at JLR to design and engineer volume cars already. It even has a badge for Europe (the dormant Rover brand). At home it has a captive market. Get recruiting TATA and dump Fiat now.

  • Fred Fred on Jun 15, 2011

    For Tata to publically critisize a business dealing seems serious. I wouldn't under-estimate Tata's ability to get something done...eventually. Like Tstag says, they just need to get on with it.

  • ToolGuy This might be a good option for my spouse when it becomes available -- thought about reserving one but the $500 deposit is a little too serious. Oh sorry, that was the Volvo EX30, not the Mustang. Is Volvo part of Ford? Is the Mustang an EV? I'm so confused.
  • Mikey My late wife loved Mustangs ..We alway rented one while travelling . GM blood vetoed me purchasing one . 3 years after retirement bought an 08 rag top, followed by a 15 EB Hard top, In 18 i bought a low low mileage 05 GT rag with a stick.. The car had not been properly stored. That led to rodent issues !! Electrical nightmare. Lots of bucks !! The stick wasn't kind to my aging knees.. The 05 went to a long term dedicated Mustang guy. He loves it .. Today my garage tenant is a sweet 19 Camaro RS rag 6yl Auto. I just might take it out of hibernation this weekend. The Mustang will always hold a place in my heart.. Kudos to Ford for keeping it alive . I refuse to refer to the fake one by that storied name .
  • Ajla On the Mach-E, I still don't like it but my understanding is that it helps allow Ford to continue offering a V8 in the Mustang and F-150. Considering Dodge and Ram jumped off a cliff into 6-cylinder land there's probably some credibility to that story.
  • Ajla If I was Ford I would just troll Stellantis at all times.
  • Ronin It's one thing to stay tried and true to loyal past customers; you'll ensure a stream of revenue from your installed base- maybe every several years or so.It's another to attract net-new customers, who are dazzled by so many other attractive offerings that have more cargo capacity than that high-floored 4-Runner bed, and are not so scrunched in scrunchy front seats.Like with the FJ Cruiser: don't bother to update it, thereby saving money while explaining customers like it that way, all the way into oblivion. Not recognizing some customers like to actually have right rear visibility in their SUVs.
Next