Saab Shuts Down Again, Situation "Tense," No End In Sight

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Saab was supposed to reach 100% production speed sometime in the middle of last week after enduring a nearly two-month shutdown. But now it seems that more “material shortages” have brought the Trollhättan plant to its knees again, as Steve Wade of inside.saab.com reports

Yesterday, production at Saab Automobile stopped at lunchtime due to material shortages. We have now stopped again today for the same reasons…

The liquidity situation is still tense, and depends on several different financing solutions falling into place, long-term as well as short-term. Some milestones have been achieved, such as the letter of intent signed with Pang Da and the additional funding that their order of Saab cars means. An example of things that still await a solution is the sale and leaseback of Saab AB Property, which we have addressed in previous communications. Representatives from Spyker and Saab will continue to work with these solutions, while the dialogue between Saab and suppliers progresses.

According to one supplier quoted in GP.se, Saab has worked out new payment terms with its just-in-time suppliers, but still needs to work through issues with so-called batch suppliers. Swedish supplier sources confirm [via AN [sub]] that some suppliers still have not been paid, and have yet to restart their own production lines. And though official statements from Saab executives and spokespeople emphasize that this stoppage was not unforeseen and will be resolved, nobody at Saab seems ready to give a date for a production restart. Swedish media outlets have reported that production has been called off for the remainder of the week, though, and some suppliers have sent their workforces home.

And while the short term situation reverts from “glimmers of hope” to “same old sadness,” Saab also seems to be soft-pedaling the importance of its Pang Da deal, which Bertel and numerous other commentators have argued will not be approved by the Chinese government. Automotive News [sub] reports

“It’s tough for me to predict but I think everybody expects to come through,” Saab President and COO Tim Colbeck said at a media luncheon in New York on Tuesday.

If approved, the Pang Da deal could be a mid-term solution to Saab’s financial woes, Colbeck said. “Midterm” means at least through the end of 2012, he said, adding that Saab’s message to dealers right now is to focus on the company’s long-term potential.

“If this deal fails, it’s on to the next one. There are a lot of people looking to invest in Saab,” he said. There is no timeline for a final decision from the Chinese government on the Pang Da deal, he said.

But how many people can really be that interested in investing in Saab when only 385 Americans invested in actual Saab cars last month (around 1,600 global units for the month), and only 3,150 people have bought Saabs in the US market since the beginning of the year? And with production falling apart just days after Saab’s CEO said he would ensure that a shutdown wouldn’t happen again, this feels like the beginning of the end of the end for Saab.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Plattform Plattform on Jun 09, 2011

    I was at that lunch with Tim Colbeck and 8 other people. I sat across from him when he said that. I even recorded it on my iPhone using Voice Recorder. Right after explaining that, he said that he wasn't involved in the talks but from all indications they were confident the deal would go through. His quote merely meant that there are other interested parties is just that. You would have never guessed a Chinese auto distributor would be interested a month ago, yet here we are with the deal on the table.

  • Eldard Eldard on Jun 10, 2011

    They should sell the car exactly like that to save money.

  • Lorenzo Yes, they can recover from the Ghosn-led corporate types who cheapened vehicles in the worst ways, including quality control. In the early to mid-1990s Nissan had efficient engines, and reliable drivetrains in well-assembled, fairly durable vehicles. They can do it again, but the Japanese government will have to help Nissan extricate itself from the "Alliance". It's too bad Japan didn't have a George Washington to warn about entangling alliances!
  • Slavuta Nissan + profitability = cheap crap
  • ToolGuy Why would they change the grille?
  • Oberkanone Nissan proved it can skillfully put new frosting on an old cake with Frontier and Z. Yet, Nissan dealers are so broken they are not good at selling the Frontier. Z production is so minimal I've yet to see one. Could Nissan boost sales? Sure. I've heard Nissan plans to regain share at the low end of the market. Kicks, Versa and lower priced trims of their mainstream SUV's. I just don't see dealerships being motivated to support this effort. Nissan is just about as exciting and compelling as a CVT.
  • ToolGuy Anyone who knows, is this the (preliminary) work of the Ford Skunk Works?
Next