Pimpin' Number 39: A Tale From Afghanistan's Nascent Car Culture

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The confrontation between modern, Western societies and deeply traditional lifestyles in Afghanistan creates a healthy supply of fascinating car stories, as we’ve already heard about such uniquely Afghan manifestations of car culture as the Taliban’s Toyota Hilux-inspired maple leaf tattoos. And now here’s another one, fresh off the Reuters wire: Afghans are reportedly in a tizzy over (get this) license plates containing the number 39. Yes, really.

Afghanistan’s booming car sales industry has been thrown into chaos by a growing aversion to the number “39”, which almost overnight has become an unlikely synonym for pimp and a mark of shame in this deeply conservative country.

Drivers of cars with number plates containing 39, bought before the once-harmless double digits took on their new meaning, are mocked and taunted across Kabul.

“Now even little kids say ‘look, there goes the 39’. This car is a bad luck, I can’t take my family out in it,” said Mohammad Ashraf who works for a United Nations project.

Other “39” owners flew into a rage or refused to speak when asked whether their car was a burden.

The Guardian adds:

I did not think it would matter when I got my car,” said Zalmay Ahmadi, a 22-year-old business student. “But when I drive around all the other cars flash their lights, beep their horns and people point at me. All my classmates now call me Colonel 39.”

We’ve heard of huge demand for certain-numbered license plates before, such as the craze in Arab countries for the lowest possible license number… but we’ve never heard of a taboo number when it comes to license plates. So what gives?

According to Reuters, the exact cause of the “39” taboo is tough to pin down.

Kabul gossip blames a pimp in neighbouring Iran, which shares a common language with much of Afghanistan.

His flashy car had a 39 in its number plate, the story goes, so he was nicknamed “39” and the tag spread.

But, as is so often the case with such seemingly irrational group manias, there’s a surprisingly rational explanation for how the number 39 actually became “taboo.” Whether or not an Iranian pimp actually made the number infamous, the Afghan license plates just rolled over from five digits starting with 38 to five digits starting with 39. Oh yes, and the police will charge anywhere from $200 to $500 to swap out a plate starting with 39 for a less-offensive plate. Or, in the words of Kabul’s car dealer union boss

It is a scheme by the police traffic department to earn money from buyers

The other perspective: it’s just so much groundless gossip, making its way from one Afghan town to the next. Whatever the case, cars with 39 on their license plate have seen their resale values plummet nearly by half (if, say their owners, they can even be sold at all), intensifying the irrational nature of the meme: after all, why give up thousands in resale over a $500 bribe for a new plate? But registrations have dried up as well, reportedly falling from 70-80 per day to “two or three,” showing how powerful even a wholly irrational taboo can be in Afghanistan’s traditional society. On the upside: mysterious rumors that spread quickly often disappear twice as fast. Hopefully Afghanistan’s motorists will overcome their fear of being mistaken for a pimp soon, and learn to live with the license plate they have.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Michal Michal on Jun 16, 2011

    Much of the Western world has 13 and 666. Also try selling a car with a "444" license plate to a Chinese person. They will however pay you well for 888.

  • Rpn453 Rpn453 on Jun 17, 2011

    Being afraid of non-poisonous snakes and spiders is silly, but this is downright stupid.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next