Opel Soap, Day 2: Detroit Snubs Frau Merkel, Again

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt
opel soap day 2 detroit snubs frau merkel again

Day 2 of the Opel rumor mill, and it keeps on grinding. Is Opel up for sale or is it not? Opel, their works council and regional governments close to the labor unions dismissed yesterday’s reports of a possible sale of Opel by GM as pure speculation. Yesterday, Opel chief Karl-Friedrich Stracke sent a letter to all employees. Today, he called an all hands meeting in Rüsselsheim and appealed to his workforce to ignore the nasty rumors. What is missing: A clear denial from Detroit. Today, Germany’s chancellor Angela Merkel demanded that GM should “provide clarity regarding the future of Opel,” writes Der Stern. And the magazine adds: “GM however continues to take cover.”

Both works council chief Klaus Franz and Thomas Bieling, head of Opel’s dealer council, are looking for a clear statement from Detroit. “A letter by Mr. Stracke won’t put me at ease,” says dealer-boss Bieling. “I want a letter from Mr. Akerson. So far, there’s nothing.”

Franz wrote a letter to Merkel and asked for help. GM seems to be back to the dangerous game of ignoring the German government. The Handelsblatt reports that both Merkel’s spokesman Steffen Seibert and Beatrix Brodkorb, spokeswoman of the Germany Ministry of Economics state that the German government is in touch with Opel, but not with GM. Ever since GM reneged on Opel, Detroit and Berlin are on cold war footing.

Even the all hands meeting in Rüsselsheim could have been better. Says the Handelsblatt: “Stracke called the reports ‘speculation,’ but he did not deny them unequivocally.”

One thing is clear: Currently, Detroit would be happier without Opel on the books and dragging the newly minted stock down. Last year, Opel did cost GM $1.76 billion in losses. In November 2010, Opel chief Reilly had expected $2 billion worth of red ink. Apparently, some of that was moved into 2011. Closing down Antwerp in 2010 did cost some $200,000 per worker. Reportedly, the colleagues in Bochum sold their skins for a little more. Severance payments of up to $360,000 will flow. In the first quarter of 2011, GM tripled its profits, Opel continued to hemorrhage.

Join the conversation
3 of 21 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jun 10, 2011

    Opel may end up being for sale, but nobody's going to buy it. See script on Hummer, Saab, Saturn, and Pontiac for how it will go. The cast of characters will include wealthy Chinese conglomerates, small-time sports car mfrs, and celebrity car guys, all of whom will fall through in the end. Forget it; Opel will go down eventually, because GM can't afford the losses and Germany is not interested in them.

    • Patz Patz on Jun 10, 2011

      Sorry, I do not agree with your comment. Hummer was a brand, producing very particular cars and for really small markets (very low volumes out of the U.S.) Saab was in a disaster mode. Unfortunately. And it's still. It was a premium brand and manufacturer, with an extablished customer basis. But a small basis. And in my opinion wrong decisions has been made in the past by GM on Saab. They could have done of Saab what VW has done of Audi. They could have made a full 'premium' lineup of vehicles basing on the Opels (as Audis to VW). But it's always easy to say when you don't have the steering wheel in your hands ;) Saturn and Pontiac where brands as well. That's not the right comparison, I think. In Europe, GM doesn't have so many brands. They have Chevy and Opel mainly. Then, Cadillac (but with 'transparent' volumes to the market...)

  • Patz Patz on Jun 10, 2011

    @geozinger good point. Your understanding is right (also my German is not that good, anyway, so we might both be wrong...) Actually, interesting. I also cannot really understand the difference between Opel and GME - when we talk about legal or financial stuff, I always have hard times in understanding what's really going on. But you know, the Ruesselsheim engineering is almost a 'one thing' with the manufacturing, so I see a separate selling quite difficult. And I wonder who would really want to buy those 'expensive' plants. Also the Vauxhall facilities are very important and sensitive. Let's see what'll be next.

  • Jay Mason Your outdoor space will get better every year with a pergola. A horizontal, pole-supported framework for climbing plants is called a pergola. It creates a closed off area. pergola builder denton texas by Denton Custom Decks provide cover for outdoor gatherings. They would be more than happy to assist you with the pergola's framework.
  • Alan I would think Ford would beef up the drive line considering the torque increase, horse power isn't a factor here. I looked at a Harrop supercharger for my vehicle. Harrop offered two stages of performance. The first was a paltry 100hp to the wheels (12 000AUD)and the second was 250hp to the wheels ($20 000 (engine didn't rev harder so torque was significantly increased)). The Stage One had no drive line changes, but the Stage Two had drive line modifications. My vehicle weighs roughly the same as a full size pickup and the 400'ish hp I have is sufficient, I had little use for another 100 let alone 250hp. I couldn't see much difference in the actual supercharger setup other than a ratio change for the drive of the supercharger, so that extra $8 000 went into the drive line.
  • ToolGuy Question: F-150 FP700 ( Bronze or Black) supercharger kit is legal in 50 states, while the Mustang supercharger kit is banned in California -- why??
  • ToolGuy Last picture: Labeling the accelerator as "play" and the brake pedal as "pause" might be cute, but it feels wrong. It feels wrong because it is wrong, and it is wrong because Calculus.Sidebar: I have some in-laws who engage the accelerator and brake on a binary on/off all-in basis. So annoying as a passenger.Drive smoothly out there. 🙂
  • Johnny ringo It's an interesting vehicle, I'd like to see VW offer the two row Buzz in the states also.