Down On The Mile High Street: 1966 Ford Thunderbird

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Here’s a car that I’ve been seeing in my neighborhood for a year now; on a busy street that makes photography tough, it kept getting sort of overlooked by me when I went out hunting cars with camera in hand. Yesterday, however, I decided that a 45-year-old, 4,400-pound personal luxury coupe that still survives on the street deserves to be admired.

Thunderbirds of the middle 1960s sometimes get overlooked; not quite as swoopy and/or sporty as their predecessors, yet not as absurdly, bloattastically Malaise-ified as the T-Birds that grunted off Dearborn’s assembly lines in the following decade.

This one isn’t quite perfect, but it appears to be a good solid rust-free survivor.

A 275-horsepower 390 was the standard engine for 1966, but optional powerplant choices included 410- and 425-horse 427s (dual-quad carburetors on the latter), plus a 345-horsepower 428. Sadly, a manual transmission wasn’t an option.







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 28 comments
  • Thrashette Thrashette on Jun 08, 2011

    Crazy! My dad drove this EXACT model when I was growing up, except in bright red with a black top. It always smelled like old leather and gasoline, and for some reason the passenger seat was in the basement, not in the car. I got made fun of sooo much by my peers about this car because it was "so old" (I grew up in the 90s... still--crazy kids!). I guess I hated this car at the time, but it hindsight, it was damn sexy. I remember sitting on my dad's lap as a toddler, steering it down the dirt road. I miss the raucous "CLICK" noise of the old seatbelts, stale scent of old leather, the menacing, growling, most-likely malfunctioning roar the engine produced... After breaking down one last time on a one-lane bridge, my dad wound up selling this beauty to some farmer. I also remember this as the day I bought my first Pokemon game... now I am rambling. :) Great car. I'm glad you featured it.

  • Ciddyguy Ciddyguy on Jun 11, 2011

    About 2-3 years ago, there were 2 vintage classics that used to park near my apartment, one a 64-65 Riviera and a 64-66 T-Bird. Both were fully restored with the Riv being turquoise in color, the T-Bird being this very color but don't recall if it had a vinyl top and I don't think it had this massive C pillar either so it might've been either the 64-65 model instead and both totally stock too. Sadly, they kept getting hit with parking tickets for staying in one place too long (can't leave your car sitting for more than 72 Hrs in one spot or a ticket will be placed under your wiper) and this was done to hopefully avoid abandoned vehicles and give the city leverage to haul cars off if left on the streets too long. One day, they disappeared and I don't recall if they got the dreaded orange notice plastered to the windshield saying the cars will be towed if not moved so don't know if the owners dealt with them appropriately or they were simply towed away.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next