Dark Days In Trollhttan: Foreign Suppliers Ready To Pull The Plug On Saab
Foreign suppliers could produce the final nail in the coffin of struggling Saab, the head of a European supplier association fears. “I think that the patience has more or less run out,” Lars Holmqvist, CEO of CLEPA, the European Association of Automotive Suppliers, said to Swedish news agency TT [via The Local]
Foreign suppliers “probably have less feeling for Saab than many Swedish companies which have grown up with Saab in a different way. Many also have a personal connection to Saab because they might have driven one at some point in their life. But the foreign suppliers are tougher,” Holmqvist, himself a Swede, told TT.
Except for a few days when the lines were moving, impressing foreign dignitaries, production at Trollhättan has been at a still stand for ten weeks. Victor Muller’s pledge that “we will definitely ensure that [a production stop] will not happen again” was good for two weeks. Then it happened again.
It is easy for foreign suppliers to drop the ball on Saab. Most of them are swamped with orders and have a hard time making their largest customers happy. Even if Saab would run at planned production volumes, Saab’s orders would not create rapid eye movement in the best of times.
According to Holmqvist, patience of foreign suppliers is running out. Says Holmqvist:
“This is partly due to a lot of empty promises that have turned to nothing and partly due to lack of information. No consideration has been taken of these suppliers, they feel duped and therefore Saab is now standing there with a factory at a standstill.”
Holmqvist’s prognosis for Saab is damning:
“I am surprised that they have managed this far. I don’t think Saab will make it.”
Meanwhile, over at Sobsunited, it’s already news that Saab paid its taxes on time. Not that Saab has to pay any taxes on any profits. However, there were some $5.5 million in payroll taxes and deductions due (which gives you an idea of the cost of letting the workforce sit idle.) Somehow someone at the Swedish tax office had leaked to the press that Saab hadn’t paid the taxman. On Friday afternoon, the money hit the government’s account. As long as prompt payment of withholdings is news in Sweden, we shall continue our coverage of the sobstory. If Holmqvist is right, it won’t be long.
Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.
More by Bertel Schmitt
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- MaintenanceCosts It's not a Benz or a Jag / it's a 5-0 with a rag /And I don't wanna brag / but I could never be stag
- 3-On-The-Tree Son has a 2016 Mustang GT 5.0 and I have a 2009 C6 Corvette LS3 6spd. And on paper they are pretty close.
- 3-On-The-Tree Same as the Land Cruiser, emissions. I have a 1985 FJ60 Land Cruiser and it’s a beast off-roading.
- CanadaCraig I would like for this anniversary special to be a bare-bones Plain-Jane model offered in Dynasty Green and Vintage Burgundy.
- ToolGuy Ford is good at drifting all right... 😉
Comments
Join the conversation
The core Saab cars, 9-3 and 9-5, are overpriced GM Epsilon cars. Not horrible, but also not special enough to justify their high price. What's sad is the Opel designed Epsilon cars like the 2008 to present Malibu are so much better than the N platform 1997-2003 Malibu and the J platform Cavalier. When GM cars loose the effects of Opel and Saab, will they be as bland as the GM cars designed in the US in the 80s and 90s? I won't miss the Saab brand, but I may miss the ways platform sharing with Saab forced Chevrolet to improve.
What SAAB has successfully built on GM platforms were - and are - cars that have been attempting to make the best of limitations that were not the fault of the engineers who designed them. In all cases, these cars were off mainstream and had a number of qualities that were hard to beat - at the cost of weaknesses resulting mostly from cost cutting and synergies. Usually, in the course of their exceptionally long model cycles many of these weaknesses could be straightened out and the cars have achieved a sort of maturity much appreciated by the people who actually drove them - but unfortunately hardly perceived by the large majority of those who never did. There you have all of SAAB's troubles. But except for the 9-7 and the 9-2, SAABs have never been rebadged, and they were designed by people who knew - and still know - their jobs. Otherwise, explain how the SAAB 9-3 Sedan could be - according to a new study by the IIHS recently presented here on TTAC - the safest in the class of 4-door midsize cars - in real life, not only in crash tests. Now, at a moment when many of these rather unlucky circumstances could be changed to the better, the aftermath of a troubled takeover is hitting home.