Better Place Opens First European Battery Swap Station, Expands To Australia

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Though it doesn’t get the play it deserves in the auto media, Project Better Place is one of the most ambitious, potentially disruptive plays anywhere in the world of cars, uniquely positioning itself to eliminate the biggest shortcomings of electric vehicles. TTAC was on hand when the “end-to-end” EV services firm opened its first battery swap station in Israel, and now the firm has launched its first European swap station in Denmark. Better Place’s single model, the Renault Fluence Z.E won’t be widely available in either of the two initial launch markets until later this year, but having sold over 70,000 of its initial order of 100k units from Renault, Better Place is keeping its foot on the gas… er, juice.


Earlier this year, BP signed a deal with GM’s Australian division Holden and several suppliers, to develop large, rear-drive sedans based on the (Zeta Platform) Commodore. At the time, we noted

This project is highly significant on a number of levels. First, battery-swap-enabled large sedans operating in Australia could show the way forward for the US, by breaking stereotypes about EV size, capability and operating environments. Second, the project marks the first sign of flirtation between General Motors and Project Better Place’s battery-swap-based business.

And that initial challenge, proving that BP’s battery-swap infrastructure can provide “unlimited range” EV motoring at relatively low costs (thanks to its unique battery-leasing arrangement) outside of tiny, densely-populated markets like Israel and Denmark, is one that the firm is eager to conquer. And so BP is building on pilot testing in Canberra, Australia, by announcing that the first Fluence Z.Es will begin arriving Australia in the middle of next year. Cars will first arrive in Canberra, and Australia-wide sales will follow, and according to the firm’s press release

By 2013 Better Place will give Australia the largest electric car charge network in the world, which is expected to outpace current deployment plans in market-leading countries including the US and China.

If Better Place can build momentum and create a viable market for its EV scheme in Australia, there’s no reason it can’t do so in the US. Keep an eye on these guys…

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 15 comments
  • Edward Niedermeyer Edward Niedermeyer on Jun 29, 2011

    Thanks for the link! The full story you reference can best be found here: Fleet Boost For Electro-Commodore. 100 miles is about typical for what can be done affordably using current battery technology. Nissan's Leaf gets 100 miles of range (give or take) and it's a much smaller car. Better Place isn't trying to improve the EV's intrinsic performance... that task ultimately falls to battery developers. What BP does do is offer "unlimited" range within their charging network. Battery improvements are doubtless coming, but the challenge that remains is the long charging time, which can leave you stranded for hours at a time. BP's network eliminates that wait, swapping your used-up battery for a fresh one in about the time it takes to fill up with gas. This is why I'm so bullish on BP: it doesn't require a major improvement in battery chemistry to make EVs viable, and it eliminates a major problem (charge time) that is likely to persist even with new chemistries. It also insulates owners from battery degradation, another huge EV downside, by selling cars and only leasing batteries as part of a "mileage plan" like a cell phone's "minute plan." The downside is the upfront cost, which is significant and usually requires some kind of government assistance (also, there's currently only one car available). In general I'm not a fan of businesses that require government support, but A) most governments subsidize EVs anyway, and BP's infrastructure makes EVs viable and B) as an infrastructure play, I see BP's concept as something of a "natural monopoly" like a telephone company or utility. And for the amount of money the US spends on ethanol subsidies each year ($6b+), BP could make much of our interstate system useable by electric cars (they say Seattle-San Diego would cost about $1b)... imagine driving coast-to-coast with an EV! How's that for range?

    • See 4 previous
    • Charly Charly on Jun 30, 2011

      @cackalacka If electric cars are a success than a shared garage will have a recharger for your car

  • Zykotec Zykotec on Jun 29, 2011

    It's a great idea, sure beats hauling a diesel generator on a trailer :) I still think the biggest advantage of EV's would be for cleaner city traffic, and in places where electricity is clean in itself.

  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
Next