What's Wrong With This Picture: The Search For El Camino Edition

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

It started as a flippant Twitter comment, in which GM Global Marketing Officer Joel Ewanick agreed to champion a return for the “El Camino” if 100,000 potential buyers raised their hands for it. Smelling an opportunity for some publicity, Jalopnik quickly picked up on the “challenge” and urged readers to leave a comment in support of the trucklet. At first Ewanick tried to hedge, saying he needed 100k deposits, rather than blog comments, to approve an El Camino for the US market. But now the former Hyundai marketer has taken Jalopnik’s challenge to Chevy’s Facebook page, giving a surprising amount of credibility for a “challenge” that began with a throwaway tweet. What makes Chevy’s endorsement of the “El Camino Challenge” even more surprising: the total lack of apparent enthusiasm.

According to the most recent update at Jalopnik’s post, only about 3,800 El Camino fans have taken the time to voice their support (although more have reportedly raised their hands on Facebook). Since we can’t independently verify the current count, we’ll refrain from reading too much into what appears to be a fairly disappointing response… especially since GM may have to bring an El Camino to the US whether hordes of enthusiasts get worked up about it or not: after all, with CAFE going up, GM has to either offer smaller, more-efficient pickups or face the exotic, expensive alternatives. Which is actually a good thing. An enthusiast and ironic-nostalgia-driven El Camino (which I’d imagine as an imported, V8-powered Holden Maloo) might enjoy a brief fad (or, based on the hand-raiser numbers, not), but would ultimately flop (hello SSR). Meanwhile a basic, inexpensive, utilitarian-oriented El Camino could offer a uniquely efficient way to help truck-loving Americans out of their $100 fill-up fatigue. While giving GM an opportunity to escape its old Hummer-dominated anti-green image.

In short, fear not enthusiasts: even if the “Draft El Camino” movement fails to reach 100,000 hand-raisers (or, at this point, even 10k), GM will probably bring some kind of “ute” (as they’re known in Oz) to the US at some point. You just have be patient and let CAFE force GM into bringing the products you really want. Bet you never thought you’d read that sentence, did you?


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 83 comments
  • VanillaDude VanillaDude on May 16, 2011

    It started as a flippant Twitter comment. Enough said.

  • Cyberpine Cyberpine on Sep 02, 2011

    There is a car design that needs to be produced.. but it's not an el camino. It's a muscle car in the shape of an old school wagon, only with a 3 position easy fold down MIDGATE and under BED TRUNK. over the bed a Baja like tubular cage. The bed is hard watertight plastic. RWD using Ultracaps from for high torque axceleratino and a small FWD 4 cylinder combustion for crusing speeds. The ultracaps are mainly sourced by Flywheel Brake assist, but also by the 4 cylinder as needed. Midsized, Two door, 5-6 passengers, 300hp, 4000lb towing, 40mpg city.. yes 40! Something like this: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-FISV-un62KU/TmCtKRFRlvI/AAAAAAAAC3s/BqtS9QNta7w/s800/muscle_wagon.png

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next