Missouri: County Government Erases Red Light Camera Ordinance

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

For Jefferson County, Missouri, it was not enough to force a red light camera company to pack its bags and leave the area. Commissioners last week wiped the books clean, unanimously repealing the ordinance adopted last summer that had authorized the use of automated ticketing machines in the unincorporated parts of the county.

“The old three-member county commission decided to implement a red light camera program using ATS as the vendor,” Councilman Bob Boyer told TheNewspaper. “As is typical, ATS came to Jefferson County and found their problem for them. And then decided the best solutions were red light cameras.”

County voters had adopted a home rule charter that changed the form of government to a seven-member elected council that took office in January. Once the old council realized they would be replaced, the push to have the red light camera system up and running was accelerated.

“They had three public hearings — mandated by law — and voted on the ordinance in the same night,” Boyer said. “The result was a red light camera ordinance rammed through in six weeks.”

There was no advance publicity regarding the hearings, so the public did not have a meaningful opportunity to participate. The contract with ATS was signed on September 28. When Boyer introduced his measure to repeal the red light camera ordinance four months ago, the council heard from more than thirty residents attending a series of meetings.

“We did it the right way,” Boyer said. “I hope other communities can have the courage to stand up against ATS and their mob-like business model, and get rid of these cameras in lieu of other proven safety methods.”

ATS realized this council was going to do everything it could to uproot the camera program, so the company decided on February 8 to formally terminate its contract with the county.

“The Jefferson County Council has ignored the overwhelming majority of Missourians and Jefferson County residents who support red light safety technology to enforce our laws and save lives,” ATS vice president Jason Norton wrote to the county administrator. “ATS has decided that we no longer wish to continue our contractual relationship with Jefferson County.”

Now that their work in the county is complete, members of the council are urging state lawmakers to take up bills that would prohibit the use of red light cameras and speed cameras statewide. Boyer has also been working with the Missouri Department of Transportation to improve safety by urging them to increase the length of yellow times at problem intersections.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • CarPerson CarPerson on May 04, 2011

    “As is typical, ATS came to Jefferson County and found their problem for them. And then decided the best solutions were red light cameras.” That's how they've been doing it for 10 years and collecting handsome profits for doing so. The better way is to get the FHWA publications focused on correcting a problem the right way after determining if there is a problem in the first place.

  • Craig Fowler Craig Fowler on May 05, 2011

    But what about the CHILDREN?????

  • The Oracle Well, we’re 3-4 years in with the Telluride and right around the time the long term durability issues start to really take hold. This is sad.
  • CoastieLenn No idea why, but nothing about a 4Runner excites me post-2004. To me, they're peak "try-hard", even above the Wrangler and Gladiator.
  • AZFelix A well earned anniversary.Can they also attend to the Mach-E?
  • Jalop1991 The intermediate shaft and right front driveshaft may not be fully engaged due to suspected improper assembly by the supplier. Over time, partial engagement can cause damage to the intermediate shaft splines. Damaged shaft splines may result in unintended vehicle movement while in Park if the parking brake is not engagedGee, my Chrysler van automatically engages the parking brake when we put it in Park. Do you mean to tell me that the idjits at Kia, and the idjit buyers, couldn't figure out wanting this in THEIR MOST EXPENSIVE VEHICLE????
  • Dukeisduke I've been waiting to see if they were going to do something special for the 60th Anniversary. I was four years old when the Mustang was introduced. I can remember that one of our neighbors bought a '65 coupe (they were all titled as '65 models, even the '64-1/2 cars), and it's the first one I can remember seeing. In the '90s I knew an older gentleman that owned a '64-1/2 model coupe with the 260 V8.
Next