June Is Lane Courtesy Month: Do Your Part!

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Editor’s Note: Tomorrow is the first day of June, which the National Motorists Association has deemed “Lane Courtesy Month.” What follows is a piece entitled “Lane Courtesy: A Driving Ethic,” which was originally posted at the NMA’s website. There, the NMA has dedicated a whole page to issues of lane courtesy, including studies, fact sheets and other resources for the promotion of lane courtesy. TTAC thanks the NMA for drawing attention to the perennial aggravation of “Left Lane Bandits” and encourages you, our readers, to learn more at the NMA’s website and spread the good word. With just a little more awareness of lane courtesy, a better world is indeed possible…

While there are always “exceptions to the rule” there are many elements of human conduct that are ruled not by laws or regulations, but rather by common courtesy, ethics, self-interest, and social habits.

Adherence to these unwritten patterns of human interaction is typically more consistent and predictable than behavior dictated by government edicts and orders. For example, if one stranger greets another stranger with a simple “hello” or “good morning” it would be extremely rare that the other person would not respond in a similar manner, even if only to nod or smile. To do otherwise would be considered rude and unfriendly, but it is not illegal.

The same is true for interactions between motorists, unfortunately, the insulating quality of an automobile retards or distorts these interactions.

When motorists enter a construction zone where two lanes narrow to two the natural pattern that evolves is that the drivers take turns entering the single lane; first from one lane and then from the other lane. No law, just a common courtesy. The same interactions take place when vehicles enter and merge onto limited access and divided highways.

The point is that much of our driving behavior is really dictated by patterns that have evolved over the past century. These patterns are now part of our driving ethic. Lane courtesy, the practice of yielding the left lane on multi-lane highways to faster and passing traffic, should be part of that ethic.

Laws that require the practice of lane courtesy are helpful in that they provide a platform to promote lane courtesy and to educate the public on the benefits of this practice. As enforcement devices (like many traffic laws) they are of marginal value and they are difficult to enforce.

For lane courtesy to flourish it must be accepted as the ethical and right thing to do, not because it’s the law.

Courtesy: The National Motorists Association

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 26 comments
  • JMII JMII on Jun 01, 2011

    June is the start of hurricane season too. Among others things left lane (ab)users do that makes me nuts is not using cruise control. I do alot of towing (200 miles per weekend) and the split second people see a boat they attempt a pass - which is fine, I drive at or just below the speed limit when towing (65 mph normally). So they lane bandits wiz by assuming I must be going S L O W. However a mile up the road I'm forced to pass them as they are now coasting at 50 mph enjoying the view. But once I pass them they speed up again... I can almost hear them saying "don't let that slow-azz boat trailer get in front of us; he'll slow us down". The difference is truckers: not only do they drive at nice constant speeds (better for mileage as everyone should know) but they flash their lights indicating when its safe to rejoin their "slow" lane after a pass. I always give a quick flick of the parking lights as a thank you. With a trailer in tow I need extra room to complete a pass so lane courtesy is very important to me.

  • Nikita Nikita on Jun 01, 2011

    HOV (Carpool) and toll lanes in SoCal further exasperate the problem. Its single file for miles and no one is allowed to move right except for very sort areas or face horrendous fines. At least hybrids lose the single occupancy privilege next month!

  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
  • ChristianWimmer Best-looking current BMW in my opinion.
  • Analoggrotto Looks like a cheap Hyundai.
  • Honda1 It really does not matter. The way bidenomics is going nobody will be able to afford shyt.
Next