What's Wrong With This Picture: And The Beetle Goes On Edition

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: April 18th, 2011

what s wrong with this picture and the beetle goes on edition

What was old has become new… again! After letting the old New Beetle languish on the market for a remarkable 13th year, VW has revisited its ’90s retro hit with a longer, lower, wider update on the new Jetta’s platform [The 2012 Beetle is 71.2 inches wide (3.3 inches wider), 58.5 inches tall (.5 inches lower) and 168.4 inches long (6 inches longer)]. The engine options are largely the same as the Jetta’, with TDI, 2.5 liter five-cylinder and 2.0 Turbo mills on offer, with a 200 HP range-topper offering an electronic limited-slip diff and dual-clutch gearbox.

Convertible and Hybrid versions should be coming down the pipe shortly, but for now all VW wants to talk about is the Beetle’s return to an original-style profile, its status as a “new original” and its ability to “respect the past while looking to the future.” Which is all well and good, but no matter how well the New New Beetle may tickle the Boomers’ retro sensibilities, it’s got nothing to to do with original Beetle’s values. If anything, the New New Beetle should do some of its best work by making at least a few sub-Boomers just a little bit nostalgic for the late 1990s, a simpler time when retro cars didn’t even have to be faithful to the original as long as they offered a plastic flower vase. Now those were some special times…

#2012 #3WTP #Design #NewBeetle #Retro #VW

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 52 comments

Xeranar on Apr 19, 2011

200 HP with an optional more potent engine in a 2-door coupe that actually looks like a 911 which is a little taller and heavier, essentially a usable backseat. The only issue I have is that it's going to cost more than 20K to start. If it started at 12-14k it would effectively compete with other econoboxes. With it being essentially a mid-priced coupe with fair power but not great power like dedicated sports cars like the Z (which mangled the cheaper porsches in the 1970s) it will always be a 2nd best player. On a total side note: This car is going to become my modern 914. I'll be picking one up in a decade and cranking up the turbo. Maybe switching it out for a V6 from the passat replacement.

Like Reply
Brettc on Apr 19, 2011

I first saw the official pics on vwvortex this morning. I liked it immediately, including the LED headlights. But I'm not a fan of the bling bling rims. I was considering a Golf TDI for my next car, but now it might be a Beetle TDI. VW has removed it as an option to build your own on vw.com at the moment. So I have no idea how much it might cost. But if it's under $30000 in TDI form I might be interested. Apparently all the trim levels come with 4 wheel discs (unlike the Jetta) but only the 2.0T is coming with independent suspension at all 4 corners. The 2.5 and TDI get the twist beam rear axle like the A4 generation had. But you can also get cloth and "leatherette" along with a lot of other configuration options. Of course I'll probably wait a few years to buy one because I have to wait and see what parts are prone to fail quickly.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.