French Paper Expects Rolling Heads At Renault As Board Convenes

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Renault has scheduled an extraordinary board meeting for today, Monday, French media reports. The meeting will deal with the spy scandal that turned out to be a fraud. On Sunday, France’s Journal Du Dimanche speculated that the heads of COO Patrick Pelata, legal affairs chief Christian Husson, HR chief Jean-Yves Coudriou and security chief Remi Pagnie could be on the block after they were implicated in a letter from jail, written by Dominique Gevrey. The investigator had been hired by Renault, and was subsequently arrested on suspicions of fraud.

A Renault spokeswoman confirmed to Reuters that “we are holding an extraordinary board meeting this afternoon in relation to the affair of the executives. After the board meeting, Renault may communicate.”

The meeting follows a 20 page report filed Friday by Renault director Philippe Lagayette. The dossier “is an unvarnished account of all stages of the crisis”, says the Journal du Dimanche. There also is a report by an outside auditor.

Renault had terminated three executives in January on suspicion of industrial espionage. The executives sued for €11 million, and Renault made a counter-offer for half, if the sources of the Journal du Dimanche are correctly informed.

In the meantime, Renault has apologized to the falsely accused executives and offered reinstatement and compensation. Pelata had tendered his resignation, but Renault CEO Carlos Ghosn rejected it, “in the interests of Renault.” Ghosn, along with Pelata and other executives involved in the case returned 2010 bonuses and receive no stock options this year.

Inflammatory remarks by France’s Industry Minister Eric Besson had strained relations with China. In an interview with TV channel LCI , Besson now blasts “serious dysfunctions within the company’s management.” People responsible for the botched spy probe “must depart,” France’s Finance Minister Christine Lagarde says. Besson was the one who politicized the matter by calling it “economic warfare”, which attracted the ire of China, where Renault and Nissan have a booming joint-venture with Dongfeng. When the espionage backfired, China’s Foreign Ministry took it with good humor and said “it hoped people checked facts before unjustly implicating the country,” Taiwan’s China Post heard.

“Everything was a bit tense,” at Renault over the weekend, says the Journal du Dimanche. “Anything can happen.” We will keep you posted.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next