UAW, Detroit Gear Up For Contract Battle

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

With its effort to organize transplant manufacturers stalled, the UAW is turning all of its attention to what may be one of its toughest contract negotiations ever. The union’s rank-and-file is pushing hard to take back concessions given during the bailout, but at the same time, the union has to avoid burdening the recovering US automakers with competitive disadvantages. And because the three Detroit automakers have performed so differently over the last year (Ford made a $6.6b profit last year, GM made $4.7b and Chrysler lost $652m), the tradition of pattern bargaining will only make negotiations even tougher. But it’s huge bonuses for executives at Ford that is getting the war of words started early, as Bill Johnson, plant chairman for UAW Local 900, threatens

If they don’t restore everything (we) gave up, the membership is going to knock it down. The bonuses that were just announced are just ridiculous.

And that’s a good place for the UAW to begin negotiations, but they’re realistically not going to get everything back. So how is this going to play out?


The UAW’s head negotiator with Ford Jimmy Settles tells the Detroit Free Press that new products and job security will dominate the union’s priorities when it comes to FoMoCo, saying

Obviously, people want their concessions back, but people have a lot of anxiety because they don’t know what is going to happen to them. There are a lot of plants still in jeopardy.

But reasonable quotes from negotiators don’t change the facts: Ford was hugely profitable last year, gave large bonuses to its executives and it is the only Detroit automaker that the UAW does not have a no-strike contract with. In short, Ford could continue to suffer as the exception to pattern bargaining, and could become the test case for one of the UAW’s more ambitious plans:

I think what the UAW will try to do is try to get a pay increase for the second-tier workers,” said Arthur Schwartz, former GM labor negotiator and president of Labor and Economics Associates.

Repealing two-tier wages or giving second-tier workers a raise would be extremely helpful for the UAW, which has suffered bitter internal divisions over the unequal treatment inherent in the two-tier system. The automakers will likely fight anything but a modest pay increase for tier-two workers as the system is crucial for reducing fixed costs over time. But even if the union secured some kind of victory on the two tier front, it would be largely symbolic as

Only 1,300 of GM’s 49,000 hourly workers are full-time entry-level workers. Ford hasn’t hired any permanent workers at the lower tier but does employ 2,100 temporary workers hired at the lower wage.

Another big union ask: the return of Cost Of Living Adjustments (COLA). But with inflation at low levels and the future still uncertain, the automakers aren’t going to commit to steady increases. Instead, Bloomberg c reports that the Detroit automakers

may seek to start providing as much as 15 percent of union workers’ compensation in performance bonuses and lump-sum payments, emulating how their Japanese counterparts and salaried employees are paid.

And the automakers have already made a strong case for this bonus-drive model by distributing some of their biggest profit-sharing checks in history to workers.

With these profit-sharing checks, it’s the hope of all three automakers that they are making a down payment on a more incentive-based pay system,” said Harley Shaiken, a labor professor at the University of California-Berkeley. “There’s nothing like that check to show that it can be done.

It’s still not clear if the automakers will get the union to go along with its big bonus idea, or if the union will make any progress on its two-tier issues. But perhaps the most important issue to watch for is the further degradation of pattern bargaining. If Ford is asked to make significantly more concessions than GM or Chrysler, it could end for good the era in which the Detroit firms could at least count on labor parity with their cross-town rivals. Once that happens, the competitive picture could start getting very interesting…

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • Daro31 Daro31 on Mar 22, 2011

    I didn't realize I was so far ahead of my time, I was a foremen at Ford, trying to tape Pintos together, they were raggin on us about quality and while trying to reduce the line count of assemblers by 10%. We were suppossed to motivate the CAW guys to buld a quality product, so we could be competitive with VW, Toyota and Honda. As a rooky in the management side of the business I told the production manager, I don't care how much time you give us to build these things, or how careful we are, at the end of the day it is still a Pinto, and it is never gonna be a Honda. Those suits have no sense of humor!

  • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Mar 22, 2011

    There actually was a time for unions, to protect the workers. But that was a long time ago. These days, governments (Federal, State and Local) pretty much dictate what an employer, any employer, can and cannot do. And while the UAW has richly shared in their employers' profits over the decades through wages and benefits, the UAW has not shared in their employers' losses. In fact, the US tax payers (companies and individuals alike) have kept the UAW working and taken over paying for their current pay, health benefits and retirement guarantees. That's a good deal, if you can get it. How can I get in on this sweet deal?

  • Marty S I learned to drive on a Crosley. Also, I had a brand new 75 Buick Riviera and the doors were huge. Bent the inside edge of the hood when opening it while the passenger door was open. Pretty poor assembly quality.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Alan, I was an Apache pilot and after my second back surgery I was medically boarded off of flying status due to vibrations, climbing on and off aircraft, so I was given the choice of getting out or re-branching so I switched to Military Intel. Yes your right if you can’t perform your out doesn’t matter if your at 17 years. Dad always said your just a number, he was a retired command master chief 25 years.
  • ToolGuy "Note that those vehicles are in direct competition with models Rivian sells"• I predict that we are about to hear why this statement may not be exactly true
  • ToolGuy From the relevant Haynes Repair Manual:"Caution: The 4.6L models require a special tool to extract the water pump from the coolant crossover housing. This special tool is expensive and the removal procedure is difficult. Have the water pump replaced by a dealer service department or other qualified automotive repair facility if the tool is not available."One version of the tool is Lisle 14440; I paid $10.82 (less 5% discount, plus shipping).You can see why I never attempt my own maintenance or repairs. 😉
  • Dave M. IMO this was the last of the solidly built MBs. Yes, they had the environmentally friendly disintegrating wiring harness, but besides that the mechanicals are pretty solid. I just bought my "forever" car (last new daily driver that'll ease me into retirement), but a 2015-16 E Class sedan is on my bucket list for future purchase. Beautiful design....
Next