Watch Out, Toyota And GM: Nissan And Renault To Tie The Knot. (Update: They Won't)

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Caution: This Nikkei story has been debunked by Nissan.

Often considered, more than often denied, now it’s on the table again: Nissan and Renault, having lived in an open relationship with a joint CEO since 1999, could move under the umbrella of a common holding company. Joint CEO Carlos Ghosn told that to The Nikkei [sub] late Wednesday night in Yokohama. The managements of Nissan and Renault seem convinced that this is the way to go. However, there is a lot of work to be done before the wedding will become official.

The plan is that Nissan and Renault create a holding company which then owns shares of Nissan and Renault. Russia’s AvtoVaz, 25 percent owned by Renault, along with Romanian Dacia and South Korean Renault Samsung Motors, currently subsidiaries Renault, would become parts of the group. The holding would be responsible for setting development, production and sales strategies. The group companies would execute the strategies.

The move would also thoroughly shake up the world ranking of car companies. Had this group existed in 2010, it would have produced close to 7 million cars and would have come into spitting distance of Volkswagen. Both the Volkswagen Group and Nissan have shown impressive growth numbers lately, which would make this race even more interesting. #1 Toyota and #2 GM suddenly would find themselves in hot pursuit by two aggressive groups.

And speaking of groups: If Nissan and Renault would change the current concubinage into a formal marriage, that odd German/Japanese couple Volkswagen and Suzuki could be drawn into doing something similar. If that would happen, the Wolfsburg-Hamamatsu axis would break the 10 million units sound barrier before Toyota or GM have a chance to get there.

However, these are all what ifs at the current point in time. Ghosn told the Nikkei that if the plan is a go, it would take two or three years to implement. Ghosn will have to sell the plan to the shareholders of the group companies, one of them being the French government which owns 15 percent in Renault. The presence of AvtoVaz would provide added suspense.

The matter is giving the Nikkei sleepless nights. At 5 in the Tokyo morning, the Japanese wire service files another article, in which the move is feted as a big breakthrough for the dominance of the all-important emerging markets. However, the Volkswagen Group is likewise well positioned in all the BRIC countries, especially when Suzuki’s considerable market heft in the I of the BRIC is brought into play.

This will be a thrill to watch and to report on.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • "scarey" "scarey" on Mar 31, 2011

    Germany and Japan got together once before, if I remember my history. @Acubra- you have quite the acid tongue for someone named after a vinyl nosepiece for a tarted-up Honda.

  • Norma Norma on Mar 31, 2011

    Bertel: What's the latest relationship status of that odd German couple, eh, I mean VW/Suzuki? I heard there's some friction. Any idea how long this sort of living-together-trial will last (either by marriage or separation)?

  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek&nbsp;recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue.&nbsp;"Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
  • MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
Next