By on February 8, 2011

Anonymous informants may direct police to pull over any motorist regardless of whether the other driver has committed any traffic offenses under a ruling handed down by the Michigan Court of Appeals last week. The state’s second highest court reversed the finding of a circuit court that had insisted on police officers having probable cause before initiating a traffic stop.

The court considered a March 17, 2008 incident in which Michigan State Trooper Christopher Bommarito was on patrol in the city of Southgate. As Bommarito was heading out of a parking lot, a woman behind the wheel of a red pickup truck pointed at a nearby car and mouthed the phrase “almost hit me.” Bommarito immediately activated his siren and entered into hot pursuit. He had no other information aside from the point when he pulled over Shaun David Barbarich who was later arrested for drunk driving.

A district court upheld this arrest, but on appeal a circuit court judge saw it as a violation of the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The court of appeals initially refused to hear the case, until a state supreme court remand forced a review. The three-judge appellate panel began by noting the diminished constitutional protection afforded to Michigan drivers.

“Certainly, the courts of this state have already recognized, albeit not in cases involving citizen tips, that fewer foundational facts are necessary to justify a stop of a moving vehicle, than would be required with regard to a home or with regard to both a stop and search of that same vehicle,” Judge Michael J. Kelly wrote. “The woman’s action of pointing to the vehicle in front of her was sufficient to accurately identify defendant’s vehicle and provided precise and verifiable information to the officer, which also strongly suggests that the information was reliable… In addition, her statement, ‘Almost hit me,’ is sufficient to support an inference that an actual traffic violation occurred. While it is true that the statement could be consistent with legal behavior, it is also enough to create an inference that defendant had been driving erratically in contravention of MCL 257.626 (reckless driving, a misdemeanor).”

The appeals court also noted that since the stop happened on St. Patrick’s day and the defendant was leaving a bar, the officer’s suspicions were strengthened.

“Had the officer waited to personally observe defendant engage in dangerous and erratic driving, his suspicion would have surpassed a reasonable articulable suspicion and become a probable cause to seize defendant and issue an appropriate citation,” Judge Kelly concluded. “Thus, police would lose the intermediate step of investigatory stops based on reasonable suspicion. Here, sufficient indicia of reliability supported the citizen’s tip and Bommarito was justified in conducting the investigatory stop… The circuit court erred by concluding otherwise.”

A copy of the decision is available in a 40k PDF file at the source link below.

Source: PDF File Michigan v. Barbarich (Court of Appeals, State of Michigan, 2/1/2011)


Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

6 Comments on “Michigan Appeals Court: Anonymous Tip Justifies Traffic Stop...”

  • avatar
    M 1

    Lovely. It’s like we’re all amateur cops now. See Something Say Something.

    • 0 avatar

      Is that a bad thing?  If somebody almost crashes into you (or breaks into your neighbors house, chases your daughter down the sidewalk, etc) should we just keep our mouths shut?
      “Stop Snitching” has created anarchy in the ghetto (or if you prefer, “disadvantaged communities”).  Do you propose exporting it to the rest of society?

    • 0 avatar

      Tell you what Toad, I’ll inform the officers that I saw you taking pills regardless of what type they were.  Or that you were medicating yourself prior to getting behind the wheel of your vehicle.

      I’ll also inform them that I saw you digging in your back yard possibly hiding “evidence” or that a strange, cannibis type smell was eminating from your residence.

      I do this all because you let your dog widdle on my roses one day and I want to make your life hell.

    • 0 avatar

      I agree with ktm. Ridiculous when you don’t need proof of anything anymore. Just random accusations = guilt.

  • avatar

    I don’t think this was truly anonymous in any sense of the word. Maybe the cop didn’t get full ID from the lady in the pickup (the complianer), but he sure could have just by noting her plate number. She was not trying to be anonymous and was just reporting someone driving erratically.

    This was not a case of someone calling 911 from a payphone and refusing to identify themselves. I think the judge was correct in this case.

  • avatar

    i got several things to say.  first, how do you know that the woman’s judgment was accurate regarding “he almost hit me”?  This sounds like the Tom Cruise movie, where even thinking about the crime is enough evidence to arrest and convict a person.  Didn’t she then leave the scene of an accident?  If she was “almost hit”, then shouldn’t she have “almost stopped and filed a police report”?  How about “he almost raped me”?
    This is totally messed up.  I am so happy I live in Michigan.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • ttacgreg: I think you might consider shopping around for a better nation to live in if this one is so messed up.
  • DenverMike: The slammed Acuras seem to find illegal smogs no problem. No one really cares to take old junk off the...
  • ttacgreg: Are you here to discuss the legalities of exemptions for California or are you here to just have a Fox News...
  • Jeff S: @SCE to AUX–Agree what you have stated is reasonable and not extreme.
  • ttacgreg: I remember getting home and out of rush-hour freeway traffic in Denver in the 60s and my clothes reeked of...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber