Florida Toll Road Sued for Holding Motorists Hostage

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

A group of motorists earlier this month filed a federal class action lawsuit against Florida’s toll road system for detaining motorists who attempt to pay the tolls with cash. About 600 miles worth of toll roads and bridges are under the jurisdiction of The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), which hands operational duties over to the private firm Faneuil, Inc., which is responsible for the toll collectors. The complaint charges both firms with false imprisonment and other civil rights violations.

“For approximately four years, FDOT and Faneuil have engaged in a practice of detaining motorists and their passengers on the Turnpike System until such motorists provided certain personal information in exchange for their release,” attorney James C. Valenti wrote on behalf of the plaintiffs. “The motorists and passengers have been detained without their consent and without legal justification.”

Under FDOT policies, motorists who pay with $50 bills, and sometimes even $5 bills, are not given permission to proceed until the toll collector fills out a “Bill Detection Report” with data about the motorist’s vehicle and details from his driver’s license. Those unwilling to provide personal information to the toll collector are offered no alternative because the toll collector will not open the barrier, preventing the car from moving forward. FDOT policy does not allow passengers to exit their vehicle, and backing up is illegal and usually impossible while other cars wait behind. Some of those paying in cash object to the idea of carrying the SunPass toll transponder on privacy grounds, but the use of cash is discouraged because it increases operating costs.

“The policy of detaining motorists without their consent and without legal justification extended throughout the Turnpike System and was so permanent and well settled that it constituted custom, practice or policy which has the force of law and rises to the level of deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s and class members’ constitutional rights,” Valenti wrote. “It is believed that Defendants will continue the widespread practice of unlawful detentions and will continue to force vehicle occupants to provide personal information in exchange for their release, all in violation of plaintiffs’ and class plaintiffs’ Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights.”

An estimated 262,800 drivers have been detained since October 2006. The lawsuit seeks an injunction prohibiting Faneuil and FDOT from further detaining motorists. Neither FDOT nor Faneuil has answered the February 8 complaint.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 32 comments
  • Supremebrougham Supremebrougham on Feb 23, 2011

    I'm not a big fan of being tracked, but it is far easier to have the transponders. I live in Michigan, but I have stuck to my HHR's windshield both a SunPass and a PA Turnpike EZ Pass. They were extremely easy to get. The EZ Pass I actually got out of a vending machine in Pennsylvania! The SunPass was obtained by computer within a few business days. I don't get to travel out of MI that often, but when I do it sure is nice to get to just sail on through the toll booths.

    • See 2 previous
    • Advance_92 Advance_92 on Feb 23, 2011

      I've had an IPass from Illinois for a long time because I used to commute on one toll road and still use I-88 to head west. But it is part of EZ-Pass so I can use it across Indiana, Ohio and New York when I visit friends in New Hampshire. Does the Mass Pike also use it? If I ever need to go around Pittsburgh to points east I suppose it works there, too. This is one case where a national standard is much more useful than a collection of state transponders (note to whoever is running the E-470 around Denver).

  • Italian Italian on Feb 23, 2011

    Couldn't all tolls be standard and use one system? A standard valid in all the US?

Next