EVs In, Diesel and Hydrogen Out In Obama Budget

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer
Secretary Chu's FY 2012 Budget Briefing

View more presentations from US Department of Energy.

The EPA’s National Clean Diesel Campaign and the Department of Energy’s Hydrogen Energy Program have both been defunded in President Obama’s proposed 2012 budget, as the White House focuses on the muchdebated goal of putting one million electric cars on the road by 2015. Bloomberg reports The NCDC budget was cut from $80m in 2010 to zero, even though Obama only just reauthorized $100m per year of grants through the program ten days ago. According to Senator Tom Carper, one of the sponsors of that re-authorization, the program

leverages federal dollars so efficiently that for every $1 invested, we get over $13 in health and economic benefits in return

Oh well. Meanwhile, fans of the oil-burners imported by the German brands can relax: the NCDC focused on improving diesel emissions from freight, ports and fleets rather than subsidizing Euro-phile sports sedans. Besides, diesel isn’t the only loser in the rush to push plug-in cars to market: hydrogen is also losing out.

The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s hydrogen technology program is another loser in the proposed budget, losing some $70m in funding according to DOE’s budget briefing. It’s not clear yet what portions of that program will be affected, but it represents a huge shift away from the Bush-era proposal for over a billion dollars in hydrogen fuel cell research.

Needless to say, the pro-clean diesel and pro-hydrogen lobbies are livid over these cuts. The hydrogen crowd took the big-picture approach, arguing

Even the President acknowledged the need for a portfolio approach in his State of the Union address. Just as American leadership in microprocessor technology led to the greatest economic expansion in the U.S. since post-World War II, fuel cells and hydrogen technologies have the transformative power to drive similar economic growth in the Energy Age.

We look to Congress for leadership to ensure the position of fuel cells and hydrogen in America’s clean energy future

The diesel dudes, meanwhile, take a more common-sense approach, arguing

It’s great to invest in something that’s a moon shot, 15 or 20 years from now, but what are you going to do until then? Modest sums to help modernize and upgrade some of these older engines would be dollars well spent.

But the forces of diesel and hydrogen face an uphill battle, as the Obama budget does include $588m in EV funding, the main feature of which would make $7,500 plug-in car consumer tax credits available as a discount at the point of purchase. This proposal will be hugely popular with GM, Nissan and other firms that are ahead of the game on the plug-in front, and could well squelch any opposition from within the auto industry. But this is also merely the first step in the budget process… twists and turns could well lie ahead.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Bill Safreed Bill Safreed on Feb 15, 2011

    How about this... get the government out of picking winners and losers and let the market decide.

    • Type57SC Type57SC on May 11, 2011

      And by "market", you mean whatever technologies come out of China's push to electrify, developed and exported to us by Chinese OEMs?

  • Mike Kelley Mike Kelley on Feb 15, 2011

    The chance that our government types will make smart choices in this area is about zero. Money will go to politically connected campaign donors as usual, with GE at the top.

  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
Next