Arizona Senate Committee Approves Photo Radar Ban

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer
arizona senate committee approves photo radar ban

Arizona is home to the oldest continuously operating speed camera programs and the US headquarters for the two largest private companies that operate the equipment. It could also be the latest state to join the fifteen jurisdictions that ban automated ticketing machines. The Arizona Senate Government Reform Committee voted 5 to 1 on Wednesday to approve legislation repealing the statutes that have allowed the use of red light cameras and speed cameras in the state. The move represents a significant reversal for a legislature that in the previous session introduced no significant legislation to curtail photo enforcement thanks to a leadership that fully backed the program.

That legislature is no more. Nineteen out of the Senate’s 30 members are brand new, elected in November. Half of the House members, 30 out of 60, are serving for the first time. The new head of the Government Reform Committee, state Senator Frank Antenori (R-Vail) is the sponsor of the bill that would repeal all sections of the state code referring to photo ticketing and a bill to inform ticket recipients that existing law does not require them to respond unless properly served.

“They’re my bills,” Antenori said. “I hate photo radar. I think they infringe on several constitutional principles — the first is due process…. You have a difficulty with having the ability to face your accuser and ask your accuser questions because the machine doesn’t answer questions. You have someone who wasn’t present analyzing video that thinks they are acting as a witness of the crime when actually all they’re doing is reviewing video… They also seen to be more of a revenue generating tool rather than a safety tool.”

The measure is likely to receive consideration on the floor of the full chamber as the new Senate president is Russell Pearce (R-Mesa), a former sheriff’s deputy who is on record calling photo radar a money-making enterprise. In the House, many of the freshman members were put in office by Tea Party activists actively opposed to photo radar. The legislature’s Tea Party faction is being led by state Representative Michelle Ugenti (R-Fountain Hills), one of the strongest opponents of photo radar. The Campaign for Liberty is hopeful that the majority committed to constitutional principles will carry the day.

“Voters are insisting that the cameras need to come down and legislators have finally heard the message,” Shawn Dow with the Campaign told TheNewspaper. “Redflex will have to stop doing business in the Grand Canyon State, but fortunately for them I hear the airlines are running a special right now on one-way tickets back to Australia.”

As a backup measure, the committee also approved by a 6 to 0 vote a separate bill, SB1354, that would require a notice be printed on every photo ticket explaining that the recipient does not have to identify the individual in the photo nor “respond to the notice of violation or the uniform traffic ticket and complaint.”

A copy of Senate Bill 1352 is available in a 25k PDF file at the source link below.

Senate Bill 1352 (Arizona State Legislature, 2/17/2011)


Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • DR1665 DR1665 on Feb 18, 2011

    Well I'll be damned. An Arizona senate bill we can believe in. SB1352 > SB1070.

  • KOKing That base hybrid system must be something other than the normal Toyota Hybrid Synergy Drive, since that uses the two electric motors as the ('CVT') transmission without a separate transmission of any kind.
  • Analoggrotto Too much of the exterior is shared with the Grand Highlander. Toyota/Lexus is clearly over extended here as this was rushed in direct response to the Kia Telluride which has decimated RX sales. Lexus was not such a major offender of just changing the front and rear end caps on a lesser Toyota model (this worked for LX / Land Cruiser as the latter is already expensive) but for such a mass market vehicle, buyers will notice and may just go to Toyota (or Kia) for their big SUV.
  • Crtfour I'm a BOF SUV fan. In my opinion it's certainly not a looker (but what is these days). But it does look the part and should be great off road. Plus kudos to Toyota for retaining actual shift levers. So I give it a thumbs up.
  • Theflyersfan UX Hybrid, NX, NX Hybrid, NX Plug-In Hybrid EV, RZ, RX, RX Hybrid, RX 500h, GX, LX, and now the TX. (source: the bloated section of the Lexus SUV site) It's looking like the Taco Bell menu over there - the same dozen ingredients mixed around to make a lineup. I'm waiting for something like the WX to compete with the Chevy Trax and maybe the LXXXL to compete with the Hummer EV and maybe a four row crossover in 2025 and a lower-cased line like the rx or nx to compete with the German CUV-"coupes" and their slashed tops and cargo areas. C'mon Lexus, there are more micro-niches to be filled! Gather your boardroom committees together and come up with another plan! And careless parent alert: shouldn't that kid be in a booster seat? I mean in my age, we sat in the way back of station wagons on the flat floor and bounced around with every curve, but these days you gotta deck your kid out in 50 pounds of pads and bubble wrap before they leave the driveway, so get that child seat in the way back right now!
  • 28-Cars-Later Nice minivan, just add the sliding doors and quit living in denial.