Piston Slap: Bustin' a Nut in a Big Six

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

TTAC Commentator Modest Holdings writes:

Sajeev may have once read the primer on my truck but for everyone else, here’s the brief: short-box, regular cab 1994 Ford F-150, 300-six, Mazda hand-shaker. Four wheel drive, 133K, yadda yadda yadda.

Some time ago – it must have been before last winter, because my toes still haven’t recovered – the radiator fan clutch seized and the engine has consistently run cold. Fuel economy has sufered – three recent 1,600 mile interstate runs averaged 12.2, 11.5 and 11.9 mpg on a combination of hi-altitude 85 straight gas and what I suspect was E-10 87 octane through Nebraska and Iowa.

I was going to replace the damn thing back in…January?… but couldn’t get the nut busted free and gave up. It did nothing for my ambition when I changed a friend’s water pump for her on the 3.9l in her Dakota and needed both acetylene and eventually a plasma cutter to get the fan off her old pump. So, what suggest ye to bust nut free? I’ve tried the obvious things: heat, thrice-a-day WD-40 applications, cheater bars, swear words. Many bloody knuckles resulted. I briefly considered dynamite.

If necessary, I’ll drain the whole system and pull the water pump. And get the plasma fired up. I don’t intend to replace the fan: I’ve got an electric and I hear they’re good for a few horsepower. (The big six needs all the help it can get. Heading up some mountains here in Wyoming, I’m sure I’ll have to get out and push.) I’ve heard tell the water pump should be replaced whenever the fan is replaced or removed because it will change the load on the pump’s internal bearings, but that sounds iffy to me. Thoughts?

And finally: I love the truck and bought it for the stick. But that was before I learned of the Mazda’s sometime habit of nastiness. A friend had one that blew up and simultaneously locked up the drive wheels and the engine, at 60 mph. It’s a testament to the durability of the old sixes that the engine survived the encounter, it’s a testament to my buddy that he didn’t kill himself or someone else. Question: how much trouble is a swap to a more hearty tranny? I’ve posted and browsed the forums, but there isn’t agreement. Some say it’s an easy swap. Others warn that the 4×4 transfer case will need to be moved back and new driveshafts will need to be fabricated. If so, that’s too much work and I’ll find another truck. Or wait for catastrophe.

And one final hint, since some wrench will want to know: the computer isn’t throwing any codes.

Sajeev Answers:

I shouldn’t wax nostalgically over an I-6 powered, 1994 F-150 that I truly loved (and was tempted to buy) but I will. These are real trucks: an open cockpit with great visibility, reasonable ride height and an intelligently designed bed that doesn’t need “man steps” for access. And that six-cylinder with port EFI towed like a far bigger truck: pulling other trucks, 27-ft boats, tons of mulch, etc after a swap to quicker 3.55 gears. Ultimately it was all for naught, this lovely American workhorse ran 330,000 miles only to be killed by a Cash for Clunkers rebate on a Buick Enclave. Tragic.

So let’s set your F-150 straight. Give up on the wrench, you have an obligation to make it easy with said plasma cutter. Cut off the fan at the shaft, replace the water pump (past it’s prime anyway) and do the electric fan you mentioned. The Lincoln Mark VIII electric fan is a common, affordable and very effective upgrade on the hot rod scene, if you didn’t already know.

But your story and mine have a common point: switch the stock gear to something more aggressive. I’m gonna assume you have 3.08 or 3.27 rear gears, so do yourself a solid and get a complete junkyard axle assembly with a 3.55 or 3.73 gear, do the switcheroo and return your “slow” axle as a core. You will see increased performance and almost no change in fuel economy, especially when towing on the highways. I understand the Mazda transmission is junk, but worry about that later: these big sixes go from zero to hero with the right final drive. Trust me on that.

Send your queries to mehta@ttac.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 52 comments
  • 05lgt 05lgt on Jan 18, 2011

    assuming "left hand thread" didn't end the problem: if lube/penetrant and tapping it before using a breaker bar doesn't do it, stop messing around and break out the nut splitter.

  • TR4 TR4 on Jan 18, 2011

    @ Sajeev: raise the final drive ratio to improve towing in OD? What's the point? Much easier/cheaper to just leave it in 4th/direct drive for towing and nearly the same results. Plus in direct drive there is much less stress on the tranny as there is no load on the gears and countershaft.

    • Sajeev Mehta Sajeev Mehta on Jan 18, 2011

      Very good point. What I said was applicable to an automatic model (wide ratio 4 speed, the RPM drop through the gears was murder on towing) but isn't a big deal at all with the stick.

      So...maybe I totally got this one wrong.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next