Marchionne: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet…

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

I didn’t get to spend much time with Chrysler’s revamped lineup at last week’s NAIAS, but my lovely assistant did take me on a brief tour of the lowlights: wiggly-jiggly dials, door handles that feel like they’re about to fall off in your hand and other overlooked details. Anyone can accuse me of anti-Chrysler bias, but in the preconception-free words of the light of my life (a non-TTAC-reading architectural historian), the updated 2011 Chrysler Group models were “the weakest bunch of cars at the show.”

Her harsh words were vindicated on the flight home, when a perusal of the latest Motor Trend (February 2011, featuring the news of late November 2010) struggled to justify the first part of its headline COMEBACK!: Can Chrysler Make It Stick This Time? Though MT gave the new ChryCo its best dose of pro-Detroit generosity (for example, determining that the 2011 Charger R/T is a “proper” transmission away from earning E39 M5-like “reverence”), nearly every write-up ended with a question or a qualification. And if MT isn’t willing to definitively say that these products will save Chrysler, who will? Apparently not CEO Sergio Marchionne, who is already hyping the products behind the next door…

Speaking to Automotive News [sub], Sergio noted that Chrysler had hit its 1.6m unit global sales goal for Chrysler Group last year, despite losing .6 percent of the retail market in the US (resulting in about 700k retail sales units). We will have to see what kind of impact that had on ChryCo’s year-end financial results, but Marchionne made it clear that he thinks

We are where we need to be in terms of the path to recovery

But next year will be yet another challenge, as the firm’s five-year plan calls for a 600k-unit bump in global volume based on this revamped lineup of improved (but unproven) products. And, rather than focusing on that challenge, Marchionne instead

flouted the industry taboo that discourages executives from talking about future products.

First up, a Jeep Grand Wagoneer which Marchionne promises by January 2013. That seven-passenger vehicle will replace the departing Jeep Commander, which Sergio savaged, saying

That car was unfit for human consumption. We sold some. But I don’t know why people bought them.

Man, what a hater… So much for his credibility! In all seriousness though, Marchionne sees the new Grand Wagoneer as a V8-powered “upper scale” offering, positioned at a premium to the firm’s top-level SUVs like Dodge Durango Citadel or Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland Summit.

Marchionne will also kill one of Chrysler Group’s two minivans, meaning either the Chrysler Town & Country or the Dodge Caravan will die off when the next generation of Chrysler’s most-successful product arrives in 2014. The killed-off model will be replaced at that time with

some kind of “people mover,” perhaps without sliding doors.

Fiat Multipla? Fiat Doblò? The return of the Dodge Magnum? Your wild-eyed speculation is as good as ours… and we have the better part of three years to debate it!

A long-rumored Jeep pickup based on the Wrangler chassis is also on Marchionne’s “love to produce” list, but because of conflicts with the Ram brand, it would not be sold in North America. So let’s just forget about that one for now…

Marchionne also noted that the Nitro/Liberty family is

the most significant hole in our product portfolio.

Sergio says the decision not to refresh these vehicles for 2011 was a conscious one, and that his execs are about 40 days away from a decision on a Nitro replacement. But, he warned, a Nitro replacement won’t necessarily be a Dodge-branded SUV… so there’s more mystery there.

Finally, and possibly most significantly, Marchionne touted the 2013 arrival of a 9-speed ZF transmission for front-drive products and an 8-cogger for the LX platform. One of the biggest obstacles facing MT’s pro-Chrysler enthusiasm was the continued use of unloveable five-speed autos, and weak fuel economy from the six-speed auto-equipped 200 and Journey. A hybrid 300 is also in Marchionne’s plans for 2013.

All of these developments sound like positive news for Chrysler, and we certainly hope the firms hangs tough for long enough to implement them… but they’re all quite a long ways off. And in the meantime, the real question is whether the new products can realistically generate the momentum needed to keep up with Sergio’s ambitious Five-Year Plan. Having read MT’s testing and interpreted it as a resounding “Maybe,” we at TTAC are anxiously awaiting our chance to find out for ourselves.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 28 comments
  • Gardiner Westbound Gardiner Westbound on Jan 18, 2011

    "Marchionne touted the 2013 arrival of a 9-speed ZF transmission for front-drive products and an 8-cogger for the LX platform." When even Honda cannot build a reliable 5-speed automatic transmission the prospect of a 9-speed auto built to Chrysler's price point sets my stomach churning.

    • 340-4 340-4 on Jan 18, 2011

      With Chrysler's new commitment to quality and current 'price point' (don't they have thousands more to put into the vehicle now, free of legacy costs, etc.?) and the fact that ZF is building it rather soothes my stomach. But, I guess we'll see. Same with the 8 speed auto.

  • Moparman426W Moparman426W on Jan 18, 2011

    Cruze66 +1. @ gardiner....even though the new trans will be a ZF design it will be built in Chrysler's Kokomo, Indiana plant making costs a fraction of what they would be if Chrysler bought them as complete units. ZF happens to be one of the world class transmission makers, they supply transmissions for many different cars and trucks. Honda would do well to switch to them.

  • 28-Cars-Later I'm getting a Knight Rider vibe... or is it more Knightboat?
  • 28-Cars-Later "the person would likely be involved in taking the Corvette to the next level with full electrification."Chevrolet sold 37,224 C8s in 2023 starting at $65,895 in North America (no word on other regions) while Porsche sold 40,629 Taycans worldwide starting at $99,400. I imagine per unit Porsche/VAG profit at $100K+ but was far as R&D payback and other sunk costs I cannot say. I remember reading the new C8 platform was designed for hybrids (or something to that effect) so I expect Chevrolet to experiment with different model types but I don't expect Corvette to become the Taycan. If that is the expectation, I think it will ride off into the sunset because GM is that incompetent/impotent. Additional: In ten years outside of wrecks I expect a majority of C8s to still be running and economically roadworthy, I do not expect that of Taycans.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Not all martyrs see divinity, but at least you tried.
  • ChristianWimmer My girlfriend has a BMW i3S. She has no garage. Her car parks on the street in front of her apartment throughout the year. The closest charging station in her neighborhood is about 1 kilometer away. She has no EV-charging at work.When her charge is low and she’s on the way home, she will visit that closest 1 km away charger (which can charge two cars) , park her car there (if it’s not occupied) and then she has two hours time to charge her car before she is by law required to move. After hooking up her car to the charger, she has to walk that 1 km home and go back in 2 hours. It’s not practical for sure and she does find it annoying.Her daily trip to work is about 8 km. The 225 km range of her BMW i3S will last her for a week or two and that’s fine for her. I would never be able to handle this “stress”. I prefer pulling up to a gas station, spend barely 2 minutes filling up my small 53 liter fuel tank, pay for the gas and then manage almost 720 km range in my 25-35% thermal efficient internal combustion engine vehicle.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Here in North Korea we are lucky to have any tires.
Next