Alberta, Canada Cancels 141,729 Photo Tickets

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Unable to verify the accuracy of certain speed camera readings, the government of Alberta, Canada announced Monday that it would issue full refunds to motorists. Doubt surrounds speeding citations issued from any of the forty-seven red light camera intersections in the city of Edmonton under a program known as “speed on green.” The refunds cover automated tickets mailed between November 2009 and January 14, 2011.

“This is the right action to take,” Minister of Justice and Attorney General Alison Redford said in a statement. “Our first concern is the fair administration of justice, and we cannot proceed with legal action when there is doubt about the accuracy of the city’s speed on green ticket technology.”

Edmonton Police Service officials have not disclosed the precise cause of inaccurate speed readings, but they admitted the automated ticketing machines generated at least twenty-six bogus readings. The problem was discovered when prosecutors examined a ticket claiming a vehicle was traveling at 143km/h (89 MPH) on Yellowhead Trail — along with every other vehicle on the road.

Although 141,729 tickets worth about $17 million were generated, only 102,700 worth $12.3 million have been paid. The profit is split between the city, the for-profit vendor, and the province which takes about 17 percent.

Despite the significant pricetag of paying back the fines, the Edmonton incident is far from the largest photo ticketing refund on record. In July 2003, a speed camera in Victoria, Australia accused motorist Vanessa Bridges’ 1975 Datsun 120Y of driving at 98 MPH, setting off a chain reaction of events that ultimately cost the state government A$26 million in refunds. Even after the thirty-year-old Datsun was tested and found to be capable of reaching speeds no greater than 73 MPH, police dug in their heels and insisted the photo enforcement system was accurate and that Bridges’ fine would stand. Intense publicity arising out of her case, however, forced an investigation into the cameras on the Western Ring Road. Independent testing showed faulty in-ground sensors and electromagnetic interference had been responsible for generating bogus speed readings. The government had no choice but to cancel 165,000 camera tickets.

Last year, police in Victoria, Australia admitted accuracy problems had surfaced again on the Hume Highway as the clocks used by average-speed cameras became unsynchronized. So far, officials have refused to provide refunds while a formal review is conducted. A report on the incident is expected within a week.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 20 comments
  • Steinweg Steinweg on Jan 25, 2011

    I'm sure I'll get shouted at - I always get shouted at on the interwebs - but I'd just like to say once and for the last time that the obsessing about red light cameras and speed traps is getting dull. I don't give a flying fig which county where is or is not installing or ripping down cameras, doubling or refunding fines, or being sued over same. I think "TTAAL" - "The Truth About Administrative Law" is probably the right forum for this whingeing.

    • Luke Procter Luke Procter on Jan 25, 2011

      AAAAAHHHH!!!!! There... you got shouted at. But anyway, I kinda feel the same way... but then, TTAC is slowly becoming TTALM, too... (The Truth About LeMons)... not that that's a bad thing.

  • SkiD666 SkiD666 on Jan 25, 2011

    Well since $17 million worth of tickets have been wiped out, city taxes for Edmonton will have to increase by roughly $5.7 million to make up for the loss in revenue. The province will also lose $5.7 million in revenue and incur expenses to process the refunds.

    • Jimboy Jimboy on Jan 25, 2011

      They could easily make up the shortfall by actually ENFORCING the current laws, by using traffic police. I see hundreds of infractions every day on the roads, illegal u-turns, failure to signal, either a turn or a lane change, tailgating, obstructing traffic, non-functional brake lights, refusing to yield the right of way, not to mention the other hundreds of people texting, talking on their phones, yelling at their kids in the back seat, telling their life story to the passenger beside them, all blissfully unaware of literally everything going on around them. And they all seem so SURPRISED when something bad happens to them, well, duh! Driving is a privilege, NOT a right, so learn how to do it properly. There are no accidents, only stupid/lazy/uneducated drivers. P.S. I blame our government for that, too!

  • Jkross22 Sure, but it depends on the price. All EVs cost too much and I'm talking about all costs. Depreciation, lack of public/available/reliable charging, concerns about repairability (H/K). Look at the battering the Mercedes and Ford EV's are taking on depreciation. As another site mentioned in the last few days, cars aren't supposed to depreciate by 40-50% in a year or 2.
  • Jkross22 Ford already has an affordable EV. 2 year old Mach-E's are extraordinarily affordable.
  • Lou_BC How does the lower case "armada" differ from the upper case "Armada"?
  • TMA1 Question no one asked: "What anonymous blob with ugly wheels will the Chinese market like?"BMW designers: "Here's your new 4-series."see also: Lincoln Nautilus
  • Ivor Honda with Toyota engine and powertrain would be the perfect choice..we need to dump the turbos n cut. 😀
Next