What's Wrong With This Picture: With Partners Like These Edition

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: December 30th, 2010

what s wrong with this picture with partners like these edition

Does this new BAIC BC301Z remind you of anything? How about the Mercedes-Benz B-Class (with perhaps a touch of Opel Meriva in the headlights)? Sure, it’s about a foot shorter than the B-Class, and it uses old Mitsu motors, but the resemblance is tough to deny. Still, whether you see the connection or not, Daimler probably does. After all, BAIC is supposed to be Daimler’s Chinese-market partner. But with partners like BAIC, who needs competitors? [via AutoBild]

#3WTP #China #Design

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 4 comments

MrWhopee on Dec 30, 2010

I don't understand why manufacturers blatantly copy other vehicles' styling like this. What's the point, really? Do they really think people will mistakenly buy their car while actually shopping for the donor vehicle? Average people might spot it on the road and mistakenly identify it as the donor vehicle ("Ooh, look, a Mercedes!), and the owner will get a slight boost of prestige from this, but as soon as they found out it's a cheap imitation they'll suffer a serious reputation drop ("wannabe but can't afford the real thing!") And what does it say to the manufacturers? The word unimaginative, uncreative, shameless, no morals, untrustworthy, etc. comes into mind. I wouldn't buy a toothpick from such a company, never mind a car. Even weirder is that the car isn't even a copy of the B-class underneath, but a different class of car altogether. I think it makes much more sense to copy the B-car's underpinnings (presumably would be better engineered than they could do on their own) and give it an original styling, than vice versa.

Like Reply
Tosh on Dec 30, 2010

Before we are outraged on Daimler's behalf, why don't we hear what Daimler has to say about the matter?

Like Reply

Recent Comments

1995 SC Wife has a new Ridgeline and it came with 2 years so I don't have to think about it for a while.My FIAT needed a battery (the 12V...not the drive battery), a replacement steering column cover and I had to buy a Tesla Charging adapter to use the destination charger at one of the places I frequent. Also had to replace the charge cable because I am an idiot and ran the stock one over and destroyed the connector. Around 600 bucks all in there but 250 is because of the cable.The Thunderbird has needed much the past year. ABS Pump - 300. Master Cylinder 100. Tool to bleed ABS 350 (Welcome to pre OBD2 electronics), Amp for Stereo -250, Motor mounts 150, Injectors 300, Airbag Module - 15 at the u pull it, Belts and hoses, 100 - Plugs and wires 100, Trans fluid, filter and replacement pan, 150, ignition lock cylinder and rekey - 125, Cassette Player mechanism - 15 bucks at the U Pull it, and a ton of time to do things like replace the grease in the power seat motots (it was hard and the seats wouldn't move when cold), Rear pinion seal - 15 buckjs, Fix a million broken tabs in the dash surround, recap the ride control module and all. My wife would say more, but my Math has me around 2 grand. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket and the drivers side window acts up from time to time. I do it all but if I were paying someone that would be rough. It's 30 this year though so I roll with it. You'll have times like these running old junk.
3-On-The-Tree Besides for the sake of emissions I don’t understand why the OEM’s went with small displacement twin turbo engines in heavy trucks. Like you guys stated above there really isn’t a MPG advantage. Plus that engine is under stress pulling that truck around then you hit it with turbos, more rpm’s , air, fuel, heat. My F-150 Ecoboost 3.5 went through one turbo replacement and the other was leaking. l’ll stick with my 2021 V8 Tundra.
Syke What I'll never understand about economics reporting: $1.1 billion net income is a mark of failure? Anyone with half a brain recognizes that Tesla is slowly settling in to becoming just another EV manufacturer, now that the legacy manufacturers have gained a sense of reality and quit tripping over their own feet in converting their product lines. Who is stupid enough to believe that Tesla is going to remain 90% of the EV market for the next ten years?Or is it just cheap headlines to highlight another Tesla "problem"?
Rna65689660 I had an AMG G-Wagon roar past me at night doing 90 - 100. What a glorious sound. This won’t get the same vibe.
Marc Muskrat only said what he needed to say to make the stock pop. These aren't the droids you're looking for. Move along.