Is There A Doctor In The House? Tata Tries To Revive Near-Dead Nano Sales

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Tata is doing everything possible to revive the shriveled sales of the Nano. Sales of the ultra-lowpriced Nano recently crashed to ultralow levels: In November, only 509 units changed hands, reluctantly. The success of the much hyped diminutive conveyance more and more looks like a flash in the pan, literally. The Nano became infamous for going up on flames. Then, Tata had to raise the ultralow price a few times. On top of that, Nano buyers were seen as bad credit risks by Indian banks and were hit with ultrahigh interest rates. Stir, simmer, and you have a recipe for disaster. Now, Tata has decided to fight back. However, the counter-offensive appears less inspired compared to the enthusiasm when the car was launched.

Tata now gives a four-year, 60,000km warranty on the Nano, up from 18 months or 24,000km, The Nikkei [sub] reports. Nothing earthshaking. Suzuki offers a three-year warranty on its Alto, Hyundai does the same for the Santro.

What else can Tata do? Financing. Forget about zero percent financing. Says the Nikkei: “Loans from State Bank of India, the nation’s largest commercial bank, run for seven years at annual interest of 8-11.5 percent. Most other banks offer 8-18 percent.” Before, Nano purchasers had to pay 15-19 percent, against about 11 percent for standard car loans. Has all the signs of too little, too late.

After long trials and tribulations, Tata openend a factory in Sanand that can produce 250,000 cars annually. According to The Nikkei, “accumulated shipments to November stand at only 71,326 cars.”

Ultra-lowcost cars are seen as a transitional phenomenon as a country moves towards mass motorization. Eventually, people want a real car with room for the family. Not too expensive. But also not too small. China had skipped the microcar stage completely, mass motorization was started with roomier 3-box cars such as the Santana or the Jetta, later joined by beefier Buicks. Small cars such as the Chery QQ are a recent phenomenon and all told do not command a dominating market share.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Mike C. Mike C. on Dec 17, 2010

    Perhaps they should borrow a name from Renault and re-christen it the Fuego...

  • MarcKyle64 MarcKyle64 on Dec 18, 2010

    You would think that the original VW Beetle would do well in India if people were looking for a reliable car that holds four.

  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
  • Analoggrotto I hope the walls of Mary Barra's office are covered in crushed velvet.
Next