GM Lobbying Efforts Accelerate

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer
[Graph courtesy:opensecrets.org]

Newly freed from the government’s controlling interest, GM is turning the tables back on the government by accelerating its lobbying efforts some 83 percent in the third quarter of this year. GM spent $2.72m on lobbying in the second quarter of this year, and $2.49m in the third quarter, a massive increase over the $1.36m GM spent in the third quarter of last year ( Chrysler spent $846k last quarter). Bloomberg reports

The Detroit automaker had nine registered lobbyists speaking with federal agencies and Congress on free trade agreements, distracted driver legislation, tax credits for electric vehicles, pension legislation, climate change bills [as well as] Wall Street reform; fuel economy regulations; U.S.-Asia trade; pending free trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia, and Panama; funding for renewable fuel research; defense spending; emergency response privacy regulation; event data recorders; pedestrian safety and other issues

But let’s be real about something: some of these issues are just a little more important than others….

As usual, the industry would like to keep its agenda safely away from prying eyes, instead allowing the Center for Automotive Research to lay out the game plan. CAR’s Sean McAlinden tells Forbes that increasing fuel-efficiency standards are the major concern facing the industry.

CAR warns that if that happens, the new standards could wind up having an unintended effect by putting the cost of a new vehicle out of reach for many Americans and encouraging them to keep their older, polluting cars longer. If cars are required to get an average of 60.1 miles per gallon by 2025, for instance, the average price of an automobile would rise about $8,000, CAR estimates. Add another $1,500 to $3,000 per vehicle for new mandated safety equipment like back-up cameras (proposed for 2014), brake override systems (a consequence of Toyota’s gas pedal crisis) and the price of a car quickly escalates.

That would have a devastating impact on sales and profits within the auto industry, predicts McAlinden. “The industry loses five million sales a year, three million units of production, and 222,000 jobs, while the U.S. economy loses 1.3 million jobs,” he says. “And we begin to look like the Cuban auto market, with people keeping their current cars for 20 years and more.”

Needless to say, this has all the highlights of the industry’s lobbying talking points, right down to scaring lawmakers with the specter of a US car market that resembles Cuba’s sanction-starved time capsule. Meanwhile, Detroit’s alleged “transformation” to the willing leaders of a green car revolution is looking even more suspect. Luckily the news isn’t all bad: according opensecrets.org, GM doesn’t seem to be using its political contributions to punish or reward lawmakers based on their bailout votes. Still, the administration that promised transformation from the US auto industry can’t be happy about its continued opposition to fuel economy standards. Perhaps this will be yet another prompt to bring back discussion of a gas tax hike, rather than continued reliance on the convoluted and ineffective CAFE system.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • Beerboy12 Beerboy12 on Dec 16, 2010

    GM would do well to put that money towards R&D and producing cars consumers want to buy. Its the consumers GM should be lobbying.

  • CarPerson CarPerson on Dec 17, 2010

    Sean, Cuban cars are 50-60 years old, not 20. CarPerson

  • 28-Cars-Later I'm getting a Knight Rider vibe... or is it more Knightboat?
  • 28-Cars-Later "the person would likely be involved in taking the Corvette to the next level with full electrification."Chevrolet sold 37,224 C8s in 2023 starting at $65,895 in North America (no word on other regions) while Porsche sold 40,629 Taycans worldwide starting at $99,400. I imagine per unit Porsche/VAG profit at $100K+ but was far as R&D payback and other sunk costs I cannot say. I remember reading the new C8 platform was designed for hybrids (or something to that effect) so I expect Chevrolet to experiment with different model types but I don't expect Corvette to become the Taycan. If that is the expectation, I think it will ride off into the sunset because GM is that incompetent/impotent. Additional: In ten years outside of wrecks I expect a majority of C8s to still be running and economically roadworthy, I do not expect that of Taycans.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Not all martyrs see divinity, but at least you tried.
  • ChristianWimmer My girlfriend has a BMW i3S. She has no garage. Her car parks on the street in front of her apartment throughout the year. The closest charging station in her neighborhood is about 1 kilometer away. She has no EV-charging at work.When her charge is low and she’s on the way home, she will visit that closest 1 km away charger (which can charge two cars) , park her car there (if it’s not occupied) and then she has two hours time to charge her car before she is by law required to move. After hooking up her car to the charger, she has to walk that 1 km home and go back in 2 hours. It’s not practical for sure and she does find it annoying.Her daily trip to work is about 8 km. The 225 km range of her BMW i3S will last her for a week or two and that’s fine for her. I would never be able to handle this “stress”. I prefer pulling up to a gas station, spend barely 2 minutes filling up my small 53 liter fuel tank, pay for the gas and then manage almost 720 km range in my 25-35% thermal efficient internal combustion engine vehicle.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Here in North Korea we are lucky to have any tires.
Next