Australian Candidate Takes Pro-Motorist Position

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

A candidate for the New South Wales, Australia Legislative Council is staking out a bold, pro-motorist agenda. David Leyonhjelm hopes to win a seat in the parliament’s upper chamber in the upcoming March 26 election on behalf of the Outdoor Recreation Party. The group’s platform stands for a removal of government restrictions on enjoying the use of public land for recreational purposes, including driving.

“We view current restrictions on outdoor activities as symptomatic of a larger problem of excessive regulation, bureaucracy and government intrusion,” the party’s website explains. “We support efforts to reduce the size of government in all aspects, through less regulation, greater personal choice and lower taxes… Our interests now include not only 4WD users but also fishers, motorcyclists, motoring enthusiasts, bushwalkers, hunters and shooters, skiers, horse-riders, golfers and rural property owners.”

The party joined forces with the Liberal Democratic Party, which fields national audience and shares the pro-motoring agenda. The party advocates setting speed limits according to the speed that the vast majority of drivers feel is safe — the 85th percentile speed. Enforcement of the higher limits would be done with a ten percent tolerance to account for minor mistakes and speedometer error. Radar detectors would be legalized and covert speed cameras outlawed. The party would only allow automated ticketing machines at so-called accident blackspots.

“Australia is a large country in which motor vehicles are a vital means of transport,” the website explains. “Our traffic laws need to strike a balance between safety and the need for efficient travel over long distances… Enforcement of traffic laws often has too little impact on risky driver behavior and does little more than generate government revenue. This undermines public confidence in the police and legal system. The enforcement of traffic laws is at times vindictive and oppressive, especially on young drivers.”

The party also believes the government should not focus its efforts on seatbelt and motorcycle helmet laws.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
 3 comments
  • David C. Holzman David C. Holzman on Dec 29, 2010

    While some of what they advocate is sensible, Australia is a terrible place for ad-lib off-roading, because the country is so dry. Without restrictions on where you can off-road, the landscape and ecology would be ruined for centuries.

    • Steve65 Steve65 on Dec 29, 2010

      Lacking any info about the current restrictions, it's impossible to say whether they're excessive or appropriate.

  • Greg Locock Greg Locock on Dec 30, 2010

    They lose me at the seatbelt bit, if not before. That's the #1 passive safety device in a car. Incidentally the LDP is just another bunch of loony right wingers, they have never won a seat.

  • Buickman if they name it "Recall" there will already be Brand Awareness!
  • 1995 SC I wish they'd give us a non turbo version of this motor in a more basic package. Inline Sixes in trucks = Good. Turbos that give me gobs of power that I don't need, extra complexity and swill fuel = Bad.What I need is an LV1 (4.3 LT based V6) in a Colorado.
  • 1995 SC I wish them the best. Based on the cluster that is Ford Motor Company at the moment and past efforts by others at this I am not optimistic. I wish they would focus on straigtening out the Myriad of issues with their core products first.
  • El Kevarino There are already cheap EV's available. They're called "used cars". You can get a lightly used Kia Niro EV, which is a perfectly functional hatchback with lots of features, 230mi of range, and real buttons for around $20k. It won't solve the charging infrastructure problem, but if you can charge at home or work it can get you from A to B with a very low cost per mile.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
Next