Will GOP Victory Kill The Motor Vehicle Safety Act?
Automotive News [sub] reports that the new GOP majority in the house of representatives will likely mark a shift in the political dynamic between the industry and the US government, as Republicans shift from noisy protest of government support for the industry towards orchestrating reductions in industry regulation. And, according to the Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers, the first victim of the new Republican House could be the Motor Vehicle Safety Act, a set of sweeping regulations aimed at preventing recall scandals like the Toyota unintended acceleration fiasco that took place earlier this year. House Republicans plan on holding hearings on that bill, which has passed committees in the House and Senate but has not yet faced a full vote by either full body. Says National Auto Dealers Association lobbyist Bailey Wood
There will be much more oversight, and the process will slow down
But House Republicans will also face their own challenges. With Democrat JerryBRown winning California’s gubernatorial race, national lobbyists will have a harder time resisting ever-increasing emissions standards, as California is the sole state with authority to independently regulate auto emissions. Though Republicans are likely to support the industry’s resistance to increased fuel economy standards, they will require help from the White House in order to, as the AAM’s Dave McCurdy puts it
rein in some of the more exuberant tendencies in California
With battles brewing over safety and emissions legislation, 2011 is shaping up to be an interesting year for followers of the politics of automobiles.
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Comments
Join the conversation
"With Democrat Jerry Brown winning California’s gubernatorial race, national lobbyists will have a harder time resisting ever-increasing emissions standards, as California is the sole state with authority to independently regulate auto emissions." At some point, California may overplay its hand. When the money is gone and the state has 33 million illegal immigrants living on welfare. OEMs may lose interested in building unicorn fart powered Pelosimobiles.
210Delray: You are correct about the 5 mph standard being rolled back a long time ago, during the anti-regulation presidency of Ronald Reagan. The result was very telling of the mindset of the industry, who lobbied vigorously for the repeal of the 5 mph bumper standard. The industry argued that the higher standard added weight which hurt consumers due to added gas consumption over the life of the car. I still remember shaking my head in disgust even back then. Once the standards were rolled back, most makers jumped on the bandwagon, busily saving those consumers a few gallons of gas per year. The IIHS argued that minor parking lot taps would end up costing motorists hundreds of dollars in collision repair. They filmed two identical Honda Accords being crashed into a wall at 5 mph, the only difference being the bumper design. As expected the car with 2.5 mph bumpers sustained significantly more damage than the one with 5 mph bumpers. Consumer Reports resurrected their "bumper basher" testing device because bumper quality went to hell. SUVs, which always had the lower standard had notoriously weak bumper systems in spite of the rough and tumble image. Yet another classic example of why industry can't be left to its own devices when it comes to consumer protection. However, it is interesting to note that some carmakers (Ford was one of them) chose to keep the 5 mph standard already engineered into their cars. Chrysler was one who quickly dumped the compression strut in the bumper system for the collapsible steel tube to save a few pennies per car/
Hey, how about learning to drive first? And growing up too? The sheer number of supposedly adult folks with a spolt brat's attitude is astounding, even in this far-better-than-norm forum. Any safety starts with a driver. And not even good, but sensible ones are few. No motor vehicle can be made absolutely safe. BTW, most important advances in real safety were made without any governmental persuasion. ABS, airbags, crumple zones,.. And sure, to err human, but you need a government to really screw things up.
@ John Horner Educate yourself, my friend. When you strain your gray matter on a regular basis, thinking becomes a habit. Somehow automobile managed to develop for the better part of its 100+ years without any governmental involvement. Do you find it strange? All concepts I've mentioned were either invented, or perfected and made it into production through pretty much voluntary efforts of just one European company. Oh, BTW, throw in there the 3-point seat belts, 3rd stop signal and side impact door beams too. Although these come from another country.