Illinois Man Sues Cops Over Bogus, Retaliatory Tickets

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

A motorist filed a federal lawsuit against Chicago, Illinois police officers who issued twenty-four bogus parking tickets against him over the course of fourteen months. The tickets arrived in groups of three and four and were for violations that frequently contradicted one another, requiring the vehicle to be in more than one place at a time. Mark Geinosky suspects they conspired against him to extract revenge on behalf of his ex-wife.

“Plaintiff alleges that he received tickets for violations which never occurred, and which the defendant officers knew had not occurred, as part of a deliberate campaign by officers in Unit 253 to harass him,” Geinosky’s lawyer wrote in a brief to the court. “Plaintiff was forced, over and over again, to respond to bogus parking tickets which the defendant officers gave him for malicious reasons.”

Mark Geinosky separated from his wife of twenty years, Sharon, on October 6, 2007. As part of their separation, Sharon Geinosky continued to drive a Toyota that had been registered in Mark Geinosky’s name. Within twelve days, Mark Geinosky began receiving parking tickets in the mail in groups of three and four worth around $300 per set. Alleged violations included parking in front of a fire hydrant, parking in a crosswalk and blocking a roadway.

Over several months, Geinosky contested each citation and won before administrative law officers who separately found all the tickets to be unfounded. When Geinosky filed a complaint with the police internal affairs division, he was blown off by an officer who explained the division did not investigate parking tickets. In September 2008, Geinosky sold the Toyota and got himself a new license plate. Nonetheless, on October 7, Officers Kenneth Wilkerson issued three more tickets worth $250 for parking at 7379 South Chicago at 10pm.

“In fact, it was impossible for Plaintiff to commit the alleged violations as he was no longer in possession of the Toyota,” Geinosky attorney Louis J. Meyer wrote.

Another batch of tickets arrived in December and Geinosky saw no alternative but to call the Chicago Tribune to draw attention to his plight. In March 2010, Geinosky filed suit against Wilkerson and his fellow Chicago Police Officers Steven Sabatino, Horst Hegewald, William Whelehan, Paul Roque, Jennifer Fregeau, Brian Reidy and Luis Aguilar. All were assigned to Unit 253. For their part, the police officers denied any wrongdoing through the city attorneys who argued that Geinosky has already seen justice done.

“Although he successfully contested each of these tickets before an administrative law officer, plaintiff now asserts that he is entitled to recover compensatory and punitive damages for violations of his constitutional rights,” city of Chicago attorney Colleen G. DeRosa wrote. “Thus, plaintiff has not alleged any deficiency in the appeals process, as he successfully exercised his rights and each of these tickets has been dismissed.”

Also argued that the statute of limitations is two years for a Section 1983 claim

“Defendants’ alleged issuance of parking tickets constitutes discretionary police conduct that falls beyond the parameters of an actionable class of one equal protection claim,” DeRosa wrote.

The suit is ongoing before the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • ZoomZoom ZoomZoom on Nov 16, 2010

    The people of Chicago pretty much have what they want. They actually chose this, and they affirm that choice with each election.

  • R H R H on Nov 17, 2010

    Chicago is hurting bad, financially. Chicago is short by billions funding pensions for public servants. What do you think the cops are going to do? http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-pensions-deals-20101116,0,4059864.story Speaking of which: I moved out of Chicago in July of 09. I went back to the city for a friends Birthday party last saturday, walked down the block to the paybox, and gave them my cc for parking. Pay parking in that area ends at 9pm. I find a ticket on my car. "NO OR IMPROPERLY PLACED CITY STICKER", a $120 ticket!!! My car has not been registered in Chicago for over 18 months! This is the _2nd_ "NO CITY STICKER" ticket I've received in 3 months (1 from Chicago, 1 from Evanston). Btw: 2 tickets in Chicago = the boot!

  • TheEndlessEnigma My 2016 FiST has been the most reliable car I've owned.
  • MaintenanceCosts I already set out total costs, so this time I'll list what's had to be done on my cars (not counting oil changes, recall, or free services):2019 Bolt (25k mi): new 12v battery, pending tires & battery cooling service2016 Highlander (from 43k to 69k mi): new front rotors, new pads all around, new PCV valve, 2x 12v batteries, light bulbs, pending tires2011 335i (from 89k to 91k): new valve cover gasket, new spark plugs, light bulbs, pending rear main seal1995 Legend (from 185k to 203k): timing belt/water pump, new EGR valve + pipe, struts, strut bushings, drive axles, tie rods, rear control arms, other suspension bushings, coolant hose & brake lines throughout, belts, radiator, valve cover gaskets, new power antenna, 12v battery, coils, spark plugs, tires, rear pads... it's an old car!
  • VoGhost Consistent with CR's data. I've spent about $150 total on the Model 3 in six years of ownership, outside of tires.
  • VoGhost It's just plain sad that Posky doesn't know that EV batteries are warrantied for 8 years / 100K miles.
  • Jkross22 It used to be depreciation was the most expensive part of car ownership. Seems like those days are over (New EVs and lux cars excluded). Maintenance + insurance have taken over. Dealerships offering 2 years of maintenance means nothing. That's $200 tops. It's the unexpected repairs - a wiring harness, computer module, heater core, AWD problems - that will cost dearly. Brakes can be expensive since many cars now can't have rotors resurfaced. Even independents are charging a lot for this work.
Next