Who's The Greenest Of Them All?

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Jeremy Clarkson thinks it’s a pile of wank. Bob Lutz thinks it was a crock of bowel movement. But say what you like about global warming, if you can get credentials which make you “eco-friendly”, that’s worth a lot of marketing money. Which is why Honda is probably feeling pretty chuffed with themselves.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) has awarded Honda the title of “Greenest Automaker” for the fifth year running. The award is based on car makers’ efforts to reduce carbon emissions from its cars, by analyzing average per-mile smog pollution and global warming inducing emissions of the cars. With their natural gas-powered Civic and IMA hybrid technology, Honda narrowly beat out Toyota and Hyundai to the title. “Toyota was poised to take the lead but stalled in its efforts to reduce carbon emissions. Meanwhile, Hyundai’s fleet saw dramatic efficiency improvements, pushing the company into a title contender spot,” said Jim Kliesch, a senior engineer at the Union of Concerned Scientists’ Clean Vehicle Program (quote from The LA Times).

The whole program graded the main eight car makers in the United States. The final order was:

1. Honda.

2: Toyota and Hyundai.

4. Volkswagen.

5. Nissan.

6. Ford.

7. General Motors.

8. Chrysler.

As you can see, Chrysler didn’t do too well. In fact, in the five assessments the UCS have performed over the last 10 years, Chrysler came last 4 times. Mr Kliesch had some choice words for Chrysler: “When it comes to environmental performance, Chrysler managers need to get their heads in the game.”

The data used to compile this survey was based on models from the year 2008. Now that Nissan is launching the Leaf, GM’s Volt, Ford’s electric Focus and Toyota launching a slew of hybrids. This chart might change dramatically over the next few years. As far as Chrysler goes, they are green with envy,

Green Man - watch more funny videos


Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Adamatari Adamatari on Oct 08, 2010

    Funny, that list could almost as easily be titled "a list of automakers from healthiest to least healthy" - except Honda is higher on the list than it would be by business analysis. Perhaps in a time of less affordable oil, focusing on efficient cars is a smart business decision? Certainly the activities of all these automakers show they don't expect a return to the SUV glory days.

  • Niky Niky on Oct 10, 2010

    Honda's stubborn. Their steadfast refusal to match their competitors in terms of engine displacement and their relatively light car offerings mean that their fleet is greener overall even than Toyota. Despite model-bloat (unavoidable if you have to keep up with the Joneses), the Civic still doesn't have a 2.3 - 2.5 liter engine like the competition does (and their R18, despite being old, is still the best of the breed). Honda's ethos may hurt its market share... but you've got to admire a company that stays true to its creed. While other companies may be car companies that make engines, Honda is a motor-maker that just happens to make cars.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next