Testing Times For Toyota Aren't So Testing?

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

When the whole “acceler-gate” scandal broke out, there were, pretty much, two reactions.

1. OH MY GOD!!!!!! STOP DRIVING YOUR TOYOTAS!!!!!! WE’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!!!!

And 2. Witch-hunt. Witch-hunt. Witch-hunt!

Well, irrespective of who was right, an investigation of the whole affair needed to happen. The US government did an investigation of their own and didn’t like the results. But Toyota also did an investigation of its own. They found something.

Business Week reports that ToMoCo is auditing of their suppliers of their highest priority parts in North America. What Toyota found, so far, was surprising. Toyota is finding that some parts aren’t being tested as rigorously as Toyota thought. Toyota thought that certain parts were tested four times a year; it was closer to once a year.

“We have found areas where maybe there was a misunderstanding about some aspect of the process,” said Dino Triantafyllos, vice president of product quality for Toyota North America, “These improvements we’re making, if we’d made them two years ago, maybe some of these issues wouldn’t have happened.” But didn’t this whole debacle stem from a pedal design which was prone to sticking (which is still a dodgy theory)?

Hiroshi Osada, leader of a panel formed by the Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers to help Toyota boost its quality, said “The crisis was a problem that came from the design-development stage,” He also added that closer examination of components “should be able to help prevent quality defects.” In other words, TEST YOUR PRODUCTS MORE!!!

In a strange quirk of fate, CTS, the supplier of the pedal in question, was one of the first suppliers audited by Toyota (I can’t think why). But CTS has nothing to fear. “They remain a supplier,” said Mr Triantafyllos, “We have a good relationship with them.” That’s nice.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
 3 comments
  • Mark MacInnis Mark MacInnis on Oct 15, 2010

    I am "surprised" that Toyota is "surprised'. Having spent the better part of the last two decades beating up the supplier base for cost reductions (yes, I know. They are not NEARLY as stupid about this as the D3 were/are....) Toyota is "surprised" that suppliers took out cost (or, shall I say, reserved a little money for their other stakeholders) by cutting back a bit on quality testing? Cue the scene from Casablanca about gambling-shocked police chiefs and their winnings and so on.... The whole scam of the Toyota and Honda American keiretsu's is that the money, and therefore the strategic power, accrues to the top. Toyota's suppliers are actually under the complete thrall of Toyota purchasing. The whole thing would be ripe for the Justice department's anti-trust department due to the complete lack of competitive bidding, if the DoJ wasn't completely brain dead under the last several administrations. Anyone who reads Toyota's report and doesn't realize that this is self-serving Toyota propaganda, that by throwing a few suppliers under the bus (Bad supplier! Bad! Now go stand in the corner!) they are deflecting their own accountability. Their hasn't been a true arms-length purchase transaction in the Toyota keiretsu since....well, since ever! Toyota knew. Or they should have known. Anyone believes anything else, I have a slightly used ES350 to sell you. Only driven to church on Sunday by a little old lady from Pomona. She never, ever engaged the cruise control. Seriously. I mean it.

    • See 1 previous
    • Thirty-three Thirty-three on Oct 15, 2010

      Competitive bidding? What for? Toyota is not a government agency spending tax dollars.

  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Next