Tata's Nano Goes to U.S.A. and EU. Again. Maybe

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Tata reiterated its threat to invest the the U.S. and Europe with their bargain-basement Nano car. At an event held today in Toyko, Tata’s Vice Chairman Ravi Kant said that “Tata Motors now plans to take it forward to the developed markets in Europe and in the U.S.,” The Nikkei [sub] reports. “Now plans?”

Tata had announced plans for Europe in 2008 (nothing happened). Mr Kant himself said in the beginning of the year that “we also recognize there is a market (for the Nano) not only in developing countries, but possibly in the developed countries.” (Sound familiar? He must have a stump speech.) Again, nothing happened. Nightmare scenarios of Tata and BYD flooding the U.S. and “blow up the distribution chain” by selling cars via “warehouse stores or electronics stores” made the rounds. Nothing happened. Dealers continue to die like dinosaurs without the help of cheap Indian or Chinese cars. Meanwhile, Tata struggled with getting the Nano produced in India, and in China, the sheen is off BYD’s halo.

Major barrier to entry: Tough regulations in Europe and the U.S. In Europe, a car must be EU certified before you can sell it. In the U.S., you self-certify, but woe is you if NHTSA buys a car at a dealer and it’s not within spec. Might as well close down.

When Kant announced the impending arrival of the Nano at U.S. shores last January, he said that “for the United States we need a car which has a larger engine and we need additional crash test modifications and we are in the process of doing it.” Today, he said in Tokyo: “The car we are going to be making for Europe meets European regulations.” Sound familiar? European tests are demanding. Guess where most applicants from low cost countries fail? In the crash with pedestrian dept.

While Western companies struggle with building low cost cars that emerging markets demand, producers of low cost cars in emerging markets struggle with their entry into overdeveloped and saturated markets.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Charly Charly on Oct 26, 2010

    In the US and Europe the Nano will compete with second hand cars and loose. It would also loose in India if Japan could exports it second hand cars there but it can't. ps. Do they fail the pedestrian crash test department because most of those cars are old models of European cars who are updated and decontented or is the test really that much harder?

  • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Oct 26, 2010

    The EU pedestrian protection test is tough

  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
Next