State Governors Push Tolls

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Facing massive budget shortfalls, many of the nation’s governors are turning to toll roads as a solution to their short-term spending needs. The National Governors Association last month dispatched a letter to US Senate committee leaders in the hopes of dissuading them from limiting the abilities of states to impose tolls on existing interstate freeways.

“Fiscal pressures, burgeoning capacity needs, and escalating operating and maintenance costs are forcing states to pursue innovative financing options to complement traditional financing tools,” Governors Gary R. Herbert (R-Utah) and Bev Perdue (D-North Carolina) wrote on behalf of the NGA’s Economic Development and Commerce Committee. “Governors support the development of flexible and innovative financing mechanisms that strengthen the mobility goals of the states. We oppose any federal restrictions on the ability of the states to pursue public-private partnership arrangements to address our unique infrastructure needs.”

In particular, the governors are worried about provisions in the draft transportation reauthorization bill that would place mild limits on the current system used to impose new tolling projects. Section 1504 of the draft bill, for example, requires that companies involved in the “public-private partnership” perform a full cost-benefit analysis that takes into account the risks involved. In current practice, toll deals between state officials and tolling companies are struck behind closed doors, with no opportunity for meaningful input or review by the public. The congressional plan would mandate such information — including proposed toll schedules — be placed online before the contract is finalized. The most controversial provision that governors traditionally look to conceal from the public, the non-compete clauses, are prohibited. Under these contractual arrangements, states are prohibited from expanding or improving free roads so that congestion forces frustrated motorists onto the pay routes.

“State and local authorities, as the principal owners and operators of the surface transportation system, must retain flexibility to determine the appropriate level of private sector participation in their surface transportation programs,” the governors wrote. “Therefore, we urge the Senate to avoid including these House provisions in any Senate draft.”

The Department of Transportation under Secretary Ray LaHood has also been using the gas tax dollars of motorists to promote tolling, and the White House has advanced an infrastructure bank proposal specifically designed to fund tolling projects. The combined effort is designed to overcome the initiative of federal lawmakers who have succeeded in enacting prohibitions on the conversion of existing freeways into toll roads.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Ciddyguy Ciddyguy on Oct 27, 2010

    I'm fortunate I live in a state with so little in the way of tolls, but there ARE some, some express lanes on Hwy 167 I think are paid and you have to have a transponder thingy on your windshield in order to use it but it is not a required thing so that doesn't really count though. We DO, however, have a toll on the new Tacoma Narrow's Bridge, which only carries eastbound traffic into Tacoma from the peninsula and this new bridge sits along side the old one which carries traffic ONTO the peninsula and no, it's not tolled as it opened for traffic in 1950 and had a toll for the first 20 years or so and once it was paid off, they dismantled the tolls and its been free ever since, but the reason they built the new one was to simply remove a bottleneck as traffic to and from the peninsula increased to the point that the old bridge would cause backups, it's only good for 2 lanes in each direction in the old configuration. There is talk of tolling the new 520 floating bridge over the northern end of Lake Washington and possibly tolling the existing 1-90 to keep the toll price down enough to enable them to pay off the new, wider bridge which will replace a 4 lane (2 in each direction) floating bridge that opened in 1962 and is in need of replacement and expansion and I'm not excited about the prospect, but if it keeps the tolls reasonable and actually is used to pay off the bridge and once done, is dismantled, I'm all for it for that reason only, but just to toll for revenue endlessly, not so much.

  • Loverofcars1969 Loverofcars1969 on Oct 27, 2010

    Just give up your money and we will not hurt you as much as if you dont.

  • Zerofoo The green arguments for EVs here are interesting...lithium, cobalt and nickel mines are some of the most polluting things on this planet - even more so when they are operated in 3rd world countries.
  • JMII Let me know when this a real vehicle, with 3 pedals... and comes in yellow like my '89 Prelude Si. Given Honda's track record over the last two decades I am not getting my hopes up.
  • JMII I did them on my C7 because somehow GM managed to build LED markers that fail after only 6 years. These are brighter then OEM despite the smoke tint look.I got them here: https://www.corvettepartsandaccessories.com/products/c7-corvette-oracle-concept-sidemarker-set?variant=1401801736202
  • 28-Cars-Later Why RHO? Were Gamma and Epsilon already taken?
  • 28-Cars-Later "The VF 8 has struggled to break ground in the increasingly crowded EV market, as spotty reviews have highlighted deficiencies with its tech, ride quality, and driver assistance features. That said, the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200 with leases at $429 monthly." In a not so surprising turn of events, VinFast US has already gone bankrupt.
Next