NHTSA Hearts Toyota. You Did Read Right

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Everybody, please help me out here and look out of the window: Is the sun rising in the west? No? Are clocks running backwards? No? Then WTH is going on? NHTSA Chief David Strickland praised, yes praised automakers for their dispatch on recalls, and wait until you hear this: Strickland gave a gold star to Toyota for its improvements.

All that happened in an unprecedented interview with the Detroit News. Basically, Strickland says that automakers are playing ball, even after the NHTSA has “increased the pace” of their investigations.

Automakers are making “the right decisions in terms of safety and consumers,” Strickland says. And wonders of wonders, Strickland doesn’t take credit for that. Are the automakers suddenly good, good boys, because the NHTSA got hardnosed? No way, says Strickland

“I don’t think there’s anything that’s changed in the core DNA of what we do here at NHTSA.” See, he even picks up the favorite word in the industry, DNA. (Which formerly stood for “defect not acknowledged.” Even that has changed. Over to you …)

However, Srickland concedes that the NHTSA is opening investigations faster, and after fewer complaints. He also admits that the NHTSA “has taken a harder line with automakers in some cases.” But a change in DNA? Nah.

In this year, automakers have recalled about 15m vehicles in about 500 separate campaigns. (Did you notice that we went back to ignoring most of them? We’d be Thehalftruthaboutrecalls.com, if we wouldn’t.)

As far as Toyota goes, you know, the company Strickland’s boss LaHood had called “safety deaf”, Strickland has nothing but praise. He extols a “change in how Toyota approaches defects” and says that Toyota is “working very hard to be a better company going forward.”

“Toyota really is taking safety much more seriously than they did before I took office,” says Strickland, who started running NHTSA January.

Toyota’s reaction? Thanks for the flowers, but the praise should go to the industry as a whole. The “whole recall landscape has kind of changed since our own incident,” and all automakers are now expected to be “forthcoming” said Toyota vice president of product communications, Jim Colon.

So everybody is lovey-dovey again? No bad feelings? Witch hunt, what witch hunt?

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 4 comments
  • Asapuntz Asapuntz on Oct 23, 2010

    i've said it before (somewhere :-), i'll say it again. the optimistic interpretation is that the NHTSA doesn't have the resources to micro-manage the development of electronic technologies in critical car systems, so they crack down hard on Toyota because - Toyota will actually improve its products and processes - other automakers will copy those products and processes

    • Musiccitymafia Musiccitymafia on Oct 23, 2010

      Hmm, pretty optimistic but also pretty simplistic. Maybe Strickland brought all this hearty intelligence with him when he became the chief.

  • AaronH AaronH on Oct 24, 2010

    Taxpayer-teat-sucking Vogon. Parasite.

  • Corey Lewis Facing rearwards and typing while in motion. I'll be sick in 4 minutes or less.
  • Ajla It's a tricky situation. If public charging is ubiquitous and reliable then range doesn't matter nearly as much. However they likely don't need to be as numerous as fuel pumps because of the home/work charging ability. But then there still might need to be "surge supply" of public chargers for things like holidays. Then there's the idea of chargers with towing accessibility. A lack of visible charging infrastructure might slow the adoption of EVs as well. Having an EV with a 600+ mile range would fix a lot of the above but that option doesn't seem to be economically feasible.
  • 28-Cars-Later I'm getting a Knight Rider vibe... or is it more Knightboat?
  • 28-Cars-Later "the person would likely be involved in taking the Corvette to the next level with full electrification."Chevrolet sold 37,224 C8s in 2023 starting at $65,895 in North America (no word on other regions) while Porsche sold 40,629 Taycans worldwide starting at $99,400. I imagine per unit Porsche/VAG profit at $100K+ but was far as R&D payback and other sunk costs I cannot say. I remember reading the new C8 platform was designed for hybrids (or something to that effect) so I expect Chevrolet to experiment with different model types but I don't expect Corvette to become the Taycan. If that is the expectation, I think it will ride off into the sunset because GM is that incompetent/impotent. Additional: In ten years outside of wrecks I expect a majority of C8s to still be running and economically roadworthy, I do not expect that of Taycans.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Not all martyrs see divinity, but at least you tried.
Next