Honda To Become Greater And Smaller

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Carmakers around the world are falling into each others arms faster than after a speed-dating session. Some are more promiscuous than an avowed wife swapper. What is Honda, the #2 in Japan, up to? Especially after seeing a 35 percent drop in October, and that may just be the beginning of it. Are they looking for some corporate nookie? Or will they remain celibate? The Nikkei [sub] had an interview with Honda CEO Takanobu Ito. Here are his most salient points, without any comments.

  • “During the 10 or so years (until the collapse of General Motors), the automobile industry was in a sort of bubble. In that period, carmakers could enjoy sales growth even if they only kept doing the same old things unthinkingly.”
  • “Now, the business environment is completely different. Consumers have started refusing to buy products unless they clearly and definitely need them.”
  • “I don’t deny the benefits of a good partnership. But we believe what we should value the most is not our partners but our customers. Imagine two carmakers agreeing on mutual access to their dealer networks in a tie-up aimed at expanding their sales. Would their dealers really make serious efforts to sell cars of the other maker for which they feel no affection?”
  • “Honda will have no future as a large company. We will aim to become a “great smaller” company. ”
  • “Exchange rates are determined by the market moment by moment, and there is no point in our telling how much yen a dollar should be worth. What is important is how to manage currency risks. Honda has factories around the world, and they can supply vehicles to each other (to offset the effects of currency fluctuations).”
  • “If the yen remains strong, we should be able to take advantage of a strong yen by importing cars from our overseas plants.”


  • “Japan needs to have free trade agreements with its major trade partners. This is the direction Japan should go. A policy response to the yen’s strength is necessary, but what we want to see more than anything else is free trade agreements.”
Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 43 comments
  • John Horner John Horner on Oct 24, 2010

    Honda seems to have completely lost the plot. They left certain products to rot on the vine like the S2000, NSX, Element and Pilot in a manner which would make the Old Ford proud. Meanwhile, the product Honda has redesigned often turn out to be a step backwards. Meanwhile, they have put a face on Acura only a bling deprived teenager might find attractive on a luxury vehicle. Honda was once a hybrid leader, but now is a flailing also-ran. Meanwhile, they are spending money trying to build a small jet airplane (the Honda Jet).

    Sad, so sad.

    • Geeber Geeber on Oct 25, 2010

      The NSX, S2000, and Element, okay...but the Pilot? Honda just released an all-new one last year. And please note that the NSX, S2000 and Element are niche products. Honda has not allowed the Fit, Civic, Accord or CR-V to rot on the vine. Ford allowed key products - old Taurus, Focus and Mustang - to grow long in the tooth.

  • PartsUnknown PartsUnknown on Oct 25, 2010

    I just bought a 2010 Accord LX with 5 speed manual after a steady diet of mostly European cars over the years. I am no Honda fanboy, but overall the Accord is a pretty impressive car. It does have its paradoxes however. After living with it for the past 7 months, the Accord is a high quality piece, much more so than the Malibu, Fusion and Camry that I compared it to. But consider: it has a headliner material fit for a Bentley, but the floormats are the cheapest ones I have ever encountered. In 5600 miles of daily commuting, they have worn through to the backing already (and I'm not wearing hockey skates to work either). The car has a reassuring stoutness to all of its components and exceptional interior quality, but the front left fender is misaligned, causing an uneven gap between it and the hood. Interior plastics are high quality, but the seat material on the sides of the seats is that disturbing "mouse fur" stuff that seems out of place, even in the LX. These and other content specific curiosities (the hefty damped lid for the center cupholders belongs in MOMA - but no lining for the trunk lid?) One thing is for sure - the Accord is fun to drive (relatively speaking of course), especially with a manual. Every time I hear "the Accord is bloated!!", i have to laugh, because at 3200 pounds, not only is it just 50 pounds heavier than its predecessor, it's the lightest car in its class. Double-wishbone front suspension, multi-link rear, 7,000 rpm on an engine that is happy to go there all day, seats that would be "sport seats" in another car, small diameter steering wheel, terrific steering feel - it's all there in that dull wrapper. Overall, I'm pleased with the car, and I'm sure it will be dead reliable and durable as it has been so far. It's fun-to-drive quotient is satisfying for a commuter. But, the missteps, while not earth shattering, are surprising for a Honda. Not quite up to the standard I was expecting. It will be interesting to see in what direction the company goes.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next