Ford And Mazda: Officially Still Married, But No Longer In Bed

by Bertel Schmitt

Published: October 18th, 2010

ford and mazda officially still married but no longer in bed

Most divorces are a bit messy, and the Ford/Mazda separation is no exception. Sometimes, it tales a while for reality to sink in. Here are the latest dispatches from divorce court.

Last Friday, The Nikkei [sub] said that Ford will sell most of its remaining shares in Mazda, leaving a token presence of 3 percent or less.
Later in the day (Tokyo is 13 hours ahead of NYC) the Wall Street Journal said it’s true that Ford and Mazda will split in China ( talk about old hat, we said that in January), otherwise, everything hunky-dory. “Ford’s ownership stake in Mazda remains unchanged. Ford continues to have a close strategic relationship with Mazda and we cooperate in areas of mutual benefit. We have no further comment on the speculation,” a Ford spokesman said in an email to the WSJ. Nobody believed it.
On Saturday, The Nikkei [sub] plowed ahead with the story and already whittled down the list of possible suitors for Mazda after Ford has left the fair maiden. They caught a Toyota official who said that Toyota has not been asked to buy some of the Mazda shares “that Ford Motor Co. has decided to sell. So Toyota is out.
Today, The Nikkei [sub] is standing steadfast by its story, saying that “Ford Motor Co. is set to sell a large part of its shareholdings in Mazda Motor Corp. (7261) and will invest the money instead in emerging markets.” Their source: “A person familiar with the matter.”
Meanwhile in the West, reality is beginning to sink in. Financial Times confirms today that “Ford is preparing to sell most of its remaining interest in Mazda of Japan, according to people familiar with the matter, in a move that would all but end the carmakers’ 31-year capital alliance.” The Wall Street Journal today concedes that “Ford mulls cutting its share of Mazda” and that “Ford is expected to use the proceeds to pay down debt and invest in emerging markets.”

The deal will most likely go down by the end of the year. Until then, everybody can claim that officially, nothing has happened. Just like a marriage officially ends when the judge says so.

#BertelSchmitt #Denials #Divorce #Ford #Japan #Mazda

Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 12 comments

Mtypex on Oct 18, 2010

It's quite possible that Mazda would go without a V6, but without access to capital ... it won't be around for long.

Like Reply
Mullholland on Oct 18, 2010

Prior to Ford's investment in Mazda, Mazda has maintained long-term banking connections with one of the big three Japanese banks that include Mitsubishi through its relationship with Sumitomo. If the Mazda/Mitsubishi tie-up is a good idea (and I'm not so sure it is) In order for Mazda and Mitsubishi to link up they'd have to figure out this financial conflict.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.