Fiat To Tighten Grip On Chrysler

by Cammy Corrigan

Published: October 22nd, 2010

It’s easy to see why Sergio is feeling mighty pleased with himself. Fiat is predicted to turn a €400 million profit this year (that’s about $556m) and Fiat is expanding in Brazil, a huge car market. So can some of this good fortune rub off onto Chrysler? Possibly 35 percent of it can, if Sergio has his way.

The Freep reports that Sergio Marchionne, CEO of Fiat and Chrysler, has told analysts that Fiat is planning to raise its stake in Chrysler from 20 percent to 35 percent by the end of next year “barring unforeseen circumstances”. A big vote of confidence, indeed. When Fiat took its initial stake in Chrysler, it was given the option to increase its stake by 5 percent tranches, provided it could meet certain goals.

First goal: Launch the manufacture of the 1.4 liter, four cylinder MultiAir engine at Chrysler’s plant in Dundee, Michigan. This will be done by next year, says Fiat.
Second goal: Make Chrysler produce a car in the United States, which can achieve at least 40 mpg. Marchionne is confident that will happen by next year, too.
Third goal: Get Chrysler growing outside of the United States, particularly in South America. Fiat has a clear strategy of making Chrysler grow in Europe. Just stop calling them Chryslers. But what about South America? Theoretically, this should have been the easiest to do, given Fiat’s strength in Brazil. Marchionne says that meeting this goal is “fraught with difficulties”. He bases this on Brazil’s regulations with regards to dealer networks. Apparently, Fiat is still working on that one. The Freep says that Fiat should ask for another goal. If I were Marchionne, I’d opt for that.

So to recap, Fiat is posting good profits, is strong in Brazil, is on the way to achieving 2 of their objectives for Chrysler, and may ask for a replacement of the third goal. Good job, Mr Marchionne!

How about going all out for 51 percent? Whoa, Nelly, he says. “I’m not even playing with that notion today,” said Mr Marchionne. Probably a good idea. So what’s he playing with instead?

#CammyCorrigan #Chrysler #Fiat #Goals #Italy

Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 11 comments

Sinistermisterman on Oct 22, 2010

You don't get many footballers like Vinnie and Gazza any more. It's amazing that whilst one is now doing the rounds as the Holywood Brit 'hard man', the other has descended into a seemingly terminal, alcohol fueled decline. Football used to be all about proper characters on and off the field, now it's all about vast amounts of money, sanitized stadiums and fancy haircuts whilst overpaid scuzzballs fall over at the slightest tap. Aaaand back to the article - I'm actually glad that Fiat see's a future in Chryco, it all looked very bleak over a year ago.

Like Reply
- Marjanmm on Oct 22, 2010
  
  just a couple of days ago I lamented the same thing. And it wasn't even that long ago. Just a decade or so ago you could watch premiership and see Vinnie Jones, Julian Dicks, Duncan Ferguson, Paolo Di Canio, Schmeichel ... not to forget Cantona. All mental muppets but such a pleasure to watch.
  
  Like
Cammy Corrigan on Oct 22, 2010

To anyone who's interested, I'm glad you like my choice of picture. With regards to modern football. It's a joke. Many people hail Cristiano Ronaldo as a genius footballer. In my opinion, he isn't even fit to lick the boots of the REAL Ronaldo.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Fastback on Oct 22, 2010
  
  well.... interesting you mention this..... 'cause from what I hear, the real Ronaldo would enjoy that quite a bit, Cammy! :)
  
  Like
- Cammy Corrigan on Oct 22, 2010
  
  And from what I've heard the fake Ronaldo would too!
  
  Like

Recent Comments

ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.