Curbside Classic: 1987 Chevrolet Turbo Sprint

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

The Volt is GM’s current answer to CAFE mandates and a hedge against high oil prices. In the mid eighties, the answer to the same challenge was the Chevy Sprint. The two couldn’t be more more different.

The solution then to radical improvements in efficiency was found in Japan, with GM’s partly-owned Suzuki. Their newly developed SA310/Cultus, renamed the Swift in its second generation, was tapped to be GM’s high mileage/CAFE queen . In the summer 1983, the little hatch found its way to the US, slotted in below the Chevette, and with substantially higher mileage. In its second generation here, the Sprint also rated a name change, to Geo Metro ( CC here). And rightfully, I would be showing you one of the normally-aspirated Sprints in my collection (there’s quite a few of these around here still). But then, I came across this rather rare Turbo Sprint just yesterday. Can you blame me? Who could resist this ultimate of pocket-rockets?

With its well-marked mail-slot air intake, its body kit and aero-style wheel covers, I spotted the Turbo Sprint from quite a ways off. Yes! My Sprint collection is complete! I even have a Suzuki version that must have come from Canada, but I don’t have the Canadian Pontiac Firefly. Hope springs eternal.

Strictly speaking, the turbo version of the Sprint was not the initial and primary mileage standard bearer. That would have been the basic Sprint, which carried an 36/43 EPA (adjusted) sticker, or the ER version, with a 44/51 rating. That was 58 mpg, under the old EPA formula, if I remember correctly.

Available only in 1987 and 1988 in the US, the Turbo Sprint adds fuel injection, a turbo and, and as is so prominently announced, an intercooler. All those goodies add up to 73 horsepower from the little 993 cc three-pot pressure cooker. Given that the Sprint weighed about 1600 pounds, the power-to-weight ratio is decidedly in the fun zone. If anyone cares, dragtimes.com has a listing for a stock ’87 Turbo Sprint for the quarter mile: 16.170 @ 87.00 MPH. Not bad for a car that can top 40 mpg.

Drag racing was not exactly the Turbo Sprint’s calling in life. But it was about the cheapest way to have genuine fun in 1987. It was the (original) Mini Cooper of its time, and the Fiat 500 Abarth promises to be the closest thing to it in the near future. But unlike the Mini of yore, the Sprint, including the Turbo, was/is a reliable and tough little piece of work. This on has been in its current owner’s hands for fourteen years, has 144k miles on the clock, and shows no signs of slowing down. And just for good measure, let me add that the owner of this little red scooter is a middle-aged woman, who loves it and the attention it garners.

The Sprint was quite a little bombshell when it arrived in the summer of 1984. It was the smallest car sold here for some time, undercutting even the first generation Civic by a hair. And it was the first car to be sold here with a three-cylinder engine since the Saab two stroke. I remember a business associate in LA who drove a W126 Mercedes 500SEL, but bought one of the first Sprints (to supplant, not replace the big Benz) because…well, it’s not easy to say exactly anymore; why did he do that? It was new and cool, and the second energy crisis was still a very recent memory. Well, that’s one way in which the Volt and Sprint are similar.

Just like the Civic, an extended wheelbase four-door Sprint appeared a few years later. This blue example that I shot in a Park and Ride lot is in shockingly pristine condition, and has the aura of a one-owner car. Someone else loves their Sprint, still. These four-doors really were remarkably roomy considering their tiny exteriors. They were the polar opposite of what had been Detroit’s approach to small cars in the seventies, like the Vega and Pinto. Their emphasis on cuteness and stylishness gave them pathetically cramped interiors, given their exterior dimensions. Getting into the back seat of a four door Sprint is like climbing into a limo compared to a Pinto.

The Sprint is the closest thing we ever got to a genuine Japanes kei-car, with the exception of the Honda N600 and Subaru 360. The little Suzuki is a class larger than a kei, especially in width and engine capacity. But the Turbo Sprint also follows the kei-tradition of turbocharging the little buggers.

Like everything else, our cars have gotten bigger, (generally) better and safer. And the Volt is a remarkable piece of engineering. But isn’t there a niche in the market for a modern-day Turbo Sprint? Chrysler sure hopes so; the Fiat 500 is almost exactly the same length as the Sprint, even if it weighs 600 lbs more. Not bad, all things considered. And there’s even a turbocharged two-cylinder in the line-up. Bring it on, as long as it’s as well-built and reliable as the Sprint. I know of at least one other middle-aged woman who already pines for one.

More New Curbside Classics Here

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 42 comments
  • Djkenny Djkenny on Dec 25, 2010

    The 1st post by Dan, the link from the owner... that is my story. :) Still have the car, bought in 92. Gettign ready to re do the driver's seat, detail it, and take care of a minor idle issue soon. It is a very fun, reliable, fast, efficient vehicle.

  • Djkenny Djkenny on Dec 25, 2010

    ///would love to meet the woman with the red one featured in the photos. Is that Portland?

  • EBFlex Honda all day long. Why? It's a Honda.
  • Lou_BC My ex had issues with the turbo CRV not warming up in the winter.I'd lean to the normally aspirated RAV 4. In some cases asking people to chose is like asking a Muslim and Christian to pick their favourite religion.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Agree turbo diesels are probably a different setup lower compression heat etc. I never towed with my rig and it was all 40 miles round trip to work with dealer synthetic oil 5,000mi changes. Don’t know the cause but it soured my opinion on turbo’s plus the added potential expense.
  • DesertNative More 'Look at me! Look at me!' from Elon Musk. It's time to recognize that there's nothing to see here, folks and that this is just about pumping up the stock price. When there's a real product on the ground and available, then there will be something to which we can pay attention. Until then, ignore him.
  • Bkojote Here's something you're bound to notice during ownership that won't come up in most reviews or test drives-Honda's Cruise Control system is terrible. Complete trash. While it has the ability to regulate speed if there's a car in front of you, if you're coasting down a long hill with nobody in front of you the car will keep gaining speed forcing you to hit the brakes (and disable cruise). It won't even use the CVT to engine brake, something every other manufacturer does. Toyota's system will downshift and maintain the set speed. The calibration on the ACC system Honda uses is also awful and clearly had minimum engineering effort.Here's another- those grille shutters get stuck the minute temperature drops below freezing meaning your engine goes into reduced power mode until you turn it off. The Rav4 may have them but I have yet to see this problem.
Next