By on August 13, 2010

According to a poll released last week by the Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company, UK motorists drive more erratically in the presence of speed cameras. The firm, which insures 3.8 million in England and Wales, commissioned ICM Research to survey how the driving public responds when automated ticketing machines are present. The firm concluded that, since 2001, photo enforcement may have contributed to thousands of accidents that would not have otherwise occurred.

The survey showed that 81 percent of drivers take their eyes off the road to watch the speedometer as soon as a camera comes into view. Another five percent admitted to slamming on the brakes when approaching a camera. Nearly a third, 31 percent, said they have witnessed an accident or near accident first-hand as a result of a driver’s reaction to the presence of a camera.

“Rear-end shunts are the third most common type of car crash and blame is nearly always attributed to the driver who hits the rear of the car behind,” a Liverpool Victoria release explained, citing internal claims data.

One percent of drivers reported speed cameras as a contributory factor in an accident. With 2.7 million accidents on record since the introduction of cameras, Liverpool Victoria estimated that speed cameras contributed to 27,900 collisions. Road safety experts expressed no surprise at the findings.

“People fail to recognize or judge a potential danger, as their attention is distracted by the over emphasis of the need to be precise with their speed, at specific locations,” Safe Speed co-founder Claire Armstrong said. “Disproportionate automatic enforcement that penalizes the majority of safe motorists is not about safety, but about targets and legal compliance.”

The legal compliance achieved is brief. Only nine percent of drivers claimed that they never exceed the posted speed limit while 91 percent drive over the limit. On highways where the limit is 70 MPH, 69 percent said their average speed was 81 MPH.

“Speed cameras have been a feature on UK roads for almost 20 years, yet the feedback from drivers is that while they may reduce speed they also appear to impair driving ability or at the least concentration on the road,” LV Car Insurance Managing Director John O’Roarke said.

UK photo enforcement programs are beginning to fold now that the government of Prime Minister David Cameron has kept its pledge to “end the war on the motorist” by cutting funding for speed cameras. Oxfordshire last month decided to pull the plug on its seventy-two fixed cameras. Wiltshire county council will drop sixteen camera sites in October. Buckinghamshire will drop ten of its fifty sites.


Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

7 Comments on “UK: Survey Shows Drivers Distracted by Speed Cameras...”

  • avatar

    “Rear-end shunts are the third most common type of car crash and blame is nearly always attributed to the driver who hits the rear of the car behind“

    In related news, UK speed cameras also appear to cause local space-time distortions. :D

    I’ve personally never seen an instance of a Gatso folding space to cause the braking car to hit the back of the car following it, but the LV survey makes a good point: cameras make drivers get twitchy and unpredictable.

    • 0 avatar

      @splateagle In related news, UK speed cameras also appear to cause local space-time distortions. :D

      – maybe the electronics from the EPAS, the drive-by-wire throttle, and the camera are interacting to form a virtual flux capacitor. Quick, someone call David Gilbert and Brian Ross.

    • 0 avatar

      Don’t leave Sean Kane out of this.

  • avatar

    Who paid for the study? If it was a poll/survey it is not worth the time I have wasted on it already.

  • avatar

    In related news, I saw a piece yesterday that the debate for GPS-based speed limiters has begun in the UK.

    Pity is, that currently, the proposal is to make the installation of such deviced only voluntary.

  • avatar

    No surprise here. When I drive with my company provided car, photo tickets get sent to the office, where management frowns upon you and your car can be revoked. My solution? If it’s a marginal call, and sometimes not so marginal, I jam on the brakes. A rear ender? Not my problem.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • dal20402: It was the 2002 concept that had suicide doors. The 2015 concept was nearly identical to the production...
  • Jeff S: The late night comedians do miss those late night tweets of Trump as he is sitting on the can. Never was that...
  • Jeff S: Very true you cannot have a mineral lease into perpetuity if you have not exercised the option to extract the...
  • Jeff S: @EBFlex–Now we both agree on something that Putin is full of it. See there is some room for...
  • Jeff S: @EBFlex–Again you are looking for an argument I said the car was not feasible until the Model T. Early...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber