Renault Tops Reliability Survey…In A Weird Way

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Once a new car has reached 3 years of age in the UK, it has to undergo a yearly test to make sure the key components of a car are working, and that the car is safe. It’s called an MOT. This is not the drive-it-down-to-your-friendly-gas-station-and-get-a-sticker routine. It’s pretty rigorous. It is anticipated with apprehension. Anyway, the MOT is reaching its 50th birthday after the test became mandatory in 1960. So to celebrate the MOT’s 50th anniversary, Nationwide Autocentres, a garage group that performs many MOT’s around the UK, conducted a survey (how about taking the MOT out and drinking lager until your head spins? THAT’S a good way of celebrating your birthday!). The survey consisted of the top 10 best selling cars in the UK. Then they looked at their failure rates after 3 years (some people have far too much time on their hands). Shall we have a look at the results (via the Daily Mail)? Firstly, here are the contenders:

Ford Mondeo, Ford Ka, Ford Fiesta, Ford Focus, Vauxhall Astra, Renault Megane, Vauxhall Corsa, VW Golf, Renault Clio and the BMW 3-series.

All of these cars were surveyed at their first MOT (i.e. three year old). What the surveys doesn’t take into account is how hard they’ve been driven (that pretty much equals out) and it doesen’t say what exactly has failed (it’s not a loose knob of the radio that fails the MOT, it’s usually something expensive …. T’s PASS or FAIL.)

So, who “won” this survey of the highest rate of failure at their first MOT? I’ll give you a clue. Nissan didn’t bring reliability to their alliance.

That’s right; the Renault Megane tops the charts with a whopping 25 percent failure rate at their first MOT. But before you start with the “French reliability” jokes, have a look at who came second. It’s GM with the Vauxhall Corsa with a 20 percent failure rate at their first MOT (one in 5 have to go back to the shop for some pricey repairs). When the cars hit 5 years, positions 1 and 2 get reversed, with the Corsa having a 39 percent failure rate and the Megane having a 35 percent failure rate (the French get better with age.) Position 3 is owned by the Ford Ka, but the failure rate has a sharp drop to 15 percent. The full table is shown below for your perusal. When a friend of mine read this article, he decided to email copy of this survey to Renault for the attention of Odile Desforges who is the executive vice president of Engineering and Quality. If he gets a reply I’ll let you know…

The Flop Parade (UK Edition)ModelFailuresNumber testedRenault Megane25 percent341Vauxhall Corsa20 percent576Ford Ka15 percent343Vauxhall Astra14 percent729Ford Focus13 percent963Ford Fiesta13 percent868Renault Clio13 percent604Ford Mondeo12 percent372VW Golf11 percent470BMW 3 series7 percent304
Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 13 comments
  • Sinistermisterman Sinistermisterman on Aug 30, 2010

    C'mon Cammy, Megane's are mainly bought for rep-mobiles and most are clocking 40k miles a year before they even see their first MOT. Corsa's and KA's are bought by those who can barely afford the car, let alone the servicing, so no surprises there. Also, it doesn't list what they failed on. Remember, one dud lightbulb can fail an MOT, whilst leaking (but functional) shocks will still pass, so it's still no great measure of what is a reliable/well made car. I've had old cars which have had 2 pages (with 25 items on each page) of 'advisory' items which would need fixing still pass the test... I even had a Ford Escort which only passed the emissions test because there was a hole just after the exhaust manifold and the probe didn't pick up any of the fumes! The MOT may be strict, but it's not a good measuring stick.

    • Another_pleb Another_pleb on Aug 30, 2010

      It's also worth noting what the MOT does not examine, namely anything relating to the vehicle's engine and gearbox (other than emissions); both could be functioning perfectly but as you say, a blown bulb can mean a failure. Having said that, I'm always amazed at how badly some people treat their cars; they need a little bit more than the occasional tank of supermarket petrol.

  • Davey49 Davey49 on Aug 30, 2010

    I'd still buy a Corsa regardless, they're neat looking cars and I like GM better than Ford

  • Calrson Fan Jeff - Agree with what you said. I think currently an EV pick-up could work in a commercial/fleet application. As someone on this site stated, w/current tech. battery vehicles just do not scale well. EBFlex - No one wanted to hate the Cyber Truck more than me but I can't ignore all the new technology and innovative thinking that went into it. There is a lot I like about it. GM, Ford & Ram should incorporate some it's design cues into their ICE trucks.
  • Michael S6 Very confusing if the move is permanent or temporary.
  • Jrhurren Worked in Detroit 18 years, live 20 minutes away. Ren Cen is a gem, but a very terrible design inside. I’m surprised GM stuck it out as long as they did there.
  • Carson D I thought that this was going to be a comparison of BFGoodrich's different truck tires.
  • Tassos Jong-iL North Korea is saving pokemon cards and amibos to buy GM in 10 years, we hope.
Next