GM "Core Brands" Up 25 Percent In July

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Yes, GM’s “core brands” Chevy, Buick, GMC and Cadillac combined for a 25 percent improvement over their Cash-4-Clunker-fueled July 2009 performance, although The General moved so many Pontiacs and Saturns during July of ’09 that overall sales were up only an anemic 5.5 percent. Because C4C boosted sales of value-oriented models last July, Chevrolet was up a mere 12 percent, while GMC was up 27.2 percent. The big gains in year-over-year volume came from Buick and Cadillac, which 136 and 141 percent combined. In short, every year-over-year number we’re looking at has been deeply skewed by last year’s C4C program, meaning volume numbers and month-to-month numbers will be the keys to properly analyzing this month’s sales results.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 14 comments
  • SV SV on Aug 03, 2010

    I'm still perplexed by the massive sales gains posted by the Malibu, even though there haven't been any significant updates since it came out in 2007. It's even outselling the fresher (and IMO slightly better) Fusion. Fleet sales, I guess.

    • NulloModo NulloModo on Aug 03, 2010

      Considering that last year's Malibu results should have included some C4C sales, this years jump has to be due to some fleet dumping. The one that really perplexes me is the SRX. The new SRX hasn't received great reviews overall, and in my opinion at least it's clearly a downgrade from the previous generation which was actually a pretty good vehicle. I guess it just shows how much the US buying public hates station wagons or anything that looks remotely like a station wagon.

  • Bridge2farr Bridge2farr on Aug 05, 2010

    "The new SRX hasn’t received great reviews overall, and in my opinion at least it’s clearly a downgrade from the previous generation which was actually a pretty good vehicle. I guess it just shows how much the US buying public hates station wagons or anything that looks remotely like a station wagon." The new SRX costs less and looks much nicer. Also leases much better. There you have it.

  • Oberkanone Tesla license their skateboard platforms to other manufacturers. Great. Better yet, Tesla manufacture and sell the platforms and auto manufacturers manufacture the body and interiors. Fantastic.
  • ToolGuy As of right now, Tesla is convinced that their old approach to FSD doesn't work, and that their new approach to FSD will work. I ain't saying I agree or disagree, just telling you where they are.
  • Jalop1991 Is this the beginning of the culmination of a very long game by Tesla?Build stuff, prove that it works. Sell the razors, sure, but pay close attention to the blades (charging network) that make the razors useful. Design features no one else is bothering with, and market the hell out of them.In other words, create demand for what you have.Then back out of manufacturing completely, because that's hard and expensive. License your stuff to legacy carmakers that (a) are able to build cars well, and (b) are too lazy to create the things and customer demand you did.Sit back and cash the checks.
  • FreedMike People give this company a lot of crap, but the slow rollout might actually be a smart move in the long run - they can iron out the kinks in the product while it's still not a widely known brand. Complaints on a low volume product are bad, but the same complaints hit differently if there are hundreds of thousands of them on the road. And good on them for building a plant here - that's how it should be done, and not just for the tax incentives. It'll be interesting to see how these guys do.
  • Buickman more likely Dunfast.
Next