Chrysler's Maximum Security Dealer Convention

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

When I had business at Volkswagen, arriving at Wache Sandkamp, I was always asked whether I have a cell phone on me. “Ja,” I said. “Does it have a camera?” “Nein,” I said. The guard didn’t want to see the phone, and I could keep it.

At Chrysler’s big dealer convention, to be held in September in Orlando, they won’t be so lenient. Dealers have already been told to leave all cell phones, video equipment and cameras in their hotel rooms. To ward off the intrusion of rogue recording equipment, metal detectors will be put up at the show’s entrance.

What’s the fuss about? The Wall Street Journal reports that “Chrysler is being cautious because Chief Executive Officer Sergio Marchionne is providing a deep breakdown of the vehicles dealers should expect to see coming to their lots over the next six to eight months.”

That’s it? Ultra-high security for cars that are six to eight months out? What are they worried about, that someone will build a copy?

To make matters worse, dealers have to pay $900 each to attend. Highly, highly, highly unusual. Dealers are used to be treated like royalty at these gatherings, with sumptuous dinners, big name entertainers and sometimes more, all on the dime of the carmaker. At our meetings, they received armfuls of glossy brochures featuring the cars. No own picture taking necessary. If someone did, even better. So $900, and they can’t even take an “I have been there” picture?

“The cost isn’t a major issue but it is a thorn in their side,” said Scott Hogle, founder of the auto retail blog DealershipForum.com. “They wait 15 months to see Mr. Marchionne and now they have to pay $900.”

Scott Hogle must be out of touch with his readership. “Not a major issue?” I’ve seen dealers bitch about much lesser amounts. Or that they had to pay taxes on entertainment that wasn’t strictly business.

Usually, car manufacturers worry about dealers showing up at the events, even when everything is paid for. It doesn’t sound as if Chrysler wants a huge attendance.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • DealershipForum.com DealershipForum.com on Aug 16, 2010

    It's great to see DealershipForum mentioned on TTAC. Concerning the $900 Meeting Expense, that does not include lodging or airfare. All the dealer gets for $900 is entrance into the meeting, meals/entertainment and ground transportation to the airport. Concerning my comment that the $900 Meeting Expense is not a "major issue," I stand by my words. No Chrysler dealer I know is going to lose sleep over $900; they're more concerned about Chrysler's reliance on fleet sales and the fact that 95% of the Chrysler dealers will derive ZERO benefit from the sales of the Fiat 500. (Something the Task Force failed to mention when the Chrysler/Fiat alliance was being crafted.)

  • Olddavid Olddavid on Nov 14, 2010

    As I read this on Sunday morning, the ghost of Farago comes sneaking around the fringes of my memory. Thank you Niedermeyers(sp). Were it not for you, this would be unreadable.

  • El Kevarino There are already cheap EV's available. They're called "used cars". You can get a lightly used Kia Niro EV, which is a perfectly functional hatchback with lots of features, 230mi of range, and real buttons for around $20k. It won't solve the charging infrastructure problem, but if you can charge at home or work it can get you from A to B with a very low cost per mile.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
Next