China Creates State-Owned EV Industry Alliance

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

China’s State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC) has formed an alliance of 16 Chinese government-owned businesses, aimed at unifying EV standards and speeding up research and development. According to CRIenglish.com, the non-profit group has a startup budget of about $186m, but Peoples Daily claims the group is ramping up to spend $14.7b on EV development over the next ten years (time to start worrying about an EV subsidy gap?). The alliance is said to include the country’s top three oil majors, top two power grid operators, battery and charging equipment makers, as well as the automakers China FAW Group Corporation, Dongfeng Motor Corporation and China Changan Automobile Group. And though this smacks of a response to US government spending on EV stimulus, the Chinesse industry is not exactly praising the new state-owned alliance with one voice.

Du Fangci, assistant secretary general of the China Association of Auto Manufacturers tells the Global Times, somewhat cryptically

New energy vehicles, new to all automakers worldwide, can’t be developed and operated commercially successfully just by the auto industry. But I wonder if SASAC can balance the interests among the member enterprises, which is key to keeping these firms on the same path

Not catching the drift? Li Shengmao, senior analyst with China Investment Consulting explains

As companies’ contributions are different to technologies developed jointly, SASAC should make clear the ownership of the intellectual property

And Zhong Shi, editor-in-chief of China Automotive Review, lays into the plan for making state aid exclusively available to state-owned members of the new association.

Such an association should include all firms strong in the area rather than only SOEs. Though lots of foreign firms launched technology agreements, there is no precedent of successful technology exchange in China’s auto industry,

But perhaps the most direct criticism of the plan comes from Du Fangci, who chides the plan with the very rhetoric that the Communist Party has embraced for decades now (as reported by GT)

Du said that healthy development of the industry depends on both governmental guidance and optimizing resources as determined by the market. “The government shouldn’t control both. But it looks like that is what SASAC, in this case, is doing,” said Du.

Free-market pushback against EV subsidies for state-owned automakers… does any of this sound familiar?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
  • El scotto UH, more parking and a building that was designed for CAT 5 cable at the new place?
  • Ajla Maybe drag radials? 🤔
  • FreedMike Apparently this car, which doesn't comply to U.S. regs, is in Nogales, Mexico. What could possibly go wrong with this transaction?
  • El scotto Under NAFTA II or the USMCA basically the US and Canada do all the designing, planning, and high tech work and high skilled work. Mexico does all the medium-skilled work.Your favorite vehicle that has an Assembled in Mexico label may actually cross the border several times. High tech stuff is installed in the US, medium tech stuff gets done in Mexico, then the vehicle goes back across the border for more high tech stuff the back to Mexico for some nuts n bolts stuff.All of the vehicle manufacturers pass parts and vehicles between factories and countries. It's thought out, it's planned, it's coordinated and they all do it.Northern Mexico consists of a few big towns controlled by a few families. Those families already have deals with Texan and American companies that can truck their products back and forth over the border. The Chinese are the last to show up at the party. They're getting the worst land, the worst factories, and the worst employees. All the good stuff and people have been taken care of in the above paragraph.Lastly, the Chinese will have to make their parts in Mexico or the US or Canada. If not, they have to pay tariffs. High tariffs. It's all for one and one for all under the USMCA.Now evil El Scotto is thinking of the fusion of Chinese and Mexican cuisine and some darn good beer.
  • FreedMike I care SO deeply!
Next