China Creates State-Owned EV Industry Alliance
China’s State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC) has formed an alliance of 16 Chinese government-owned businesses, aimed at unifying EV standards and speeding up research and development. According to CRIenglish.com, the non-profit group has a startup budget of about $186m, but Peoples Daily claims the group is ramping up to spend $14.7b on EV development over the next ten years (time to start worrying about an EV subsidy gap?). The alliance is said to include the country’s top three oil majors, top two power grid operators, battery and charging equipment makers, as well as the automakers China FAW Group Corporation, Dongfeng Motor Corporation and China Changan Automobile Group. And though this smacks of a response to US government spending on EV stimulus, the Chinesse industry is not exactly praising the new state-owned alliance with one voice.
Du Fangci, assistant secretary general of the China Association of Auto Manufacturers tells the Global Times, somewhat cryptically
New energy vehicles, new to all automakers worldwide, can’t be developed and operated commercially successfully just by the auto industry. But I wonder if SASAC can balance the interests among the member enterprises, which is key to keeping these firms on the same path
Not catching the drift? Li Shengmao, senior analyst with China Investment Consulting explains
As companies’ contributions are different to technologies developed jointly, SASAC should make clear the ownership of the intellectual property
And Zhong Shi, editor-in-chief of China Automotive Review, lays into the plan for making state aid exclusively available to state-owned members of the new association.
Such an association should include all firms strong in the area rather than only SOEs. Though lots of foreign firms launched technology agreements, there is no precedent of successful technology exchange in China’s auto industry,
But perhaps the most direct criticism of the plan comes from Du Fangci, who chides the plan with the very rhetoric that the Communist Party has embraced for decades now (as reported by GT)
Du said that healthy development of the industry depends on both governmental guidance and optimizing resources as determined by the market. “The government shouldn’t control both. But it looks like that is what SASAC, in this case, is doing,” said Du.
Free-market pushback against EV subsidies for state-owned automakers… does any of this sound familiar?
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- ToolGuy CXXVIII comments?!?
- ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
- Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
- Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
- ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
Join the conversation